Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 1;84(15):2533-2548. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3854.
Breast cancer includes several subtypes with distinct characteristic biological, pathologic, and clinical features. Elucidating subtype-specific genetic etiology could provide insights into the heterogeneity of breast cancer to facilitate the development of improved prevention and treatment approaches. In this study, we conducted pairwise case-case comparisons among five breast cancer subtypes by applying a case-case genome-wide association study (CC-GWAS) approach to summary statistics data of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The approach identified 13 statistically significant loci and eight suggestive loci, the majority of which were identified from comparisons between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal A breast cancer. Associations of lead variants in 12 loci remained statistically significant after accounting for previously reported breast cancer susceptibility variants, among which, two were genome-wide significant. Fine mapping implicated putative functional/causal variants and risk genes at several loci, e.g., 3q26.31/TNFSF10, 8q22.3/NACAP1/GRHL2, and 8q23.3/LINC00536/TRPS1, for TNBC as compared with luminal cancer. Functional investigation further identified rs16867605 at 8q22.3 as a SNP that modulates the enhancer activity of GRHL2. Subtype-informative polygenic risk scores (PRS) were derived, and patients with a high subtype-informative PRS had an up to two-fold increased risk of being diagnosed with TNBC instead of luminal cancers. The CC-GWAS PRS remained statistically significant after adjusting for TNBC PRS derived from traditional case-control GWAS in The Cancer Genome Atlas and the African Ancestry Breast Cancer Genetic Consortium. The CC-GWAS PRS was also associated with overall survival and disease-specific survival among patients with breast cancer. Overall, these findings have advanced our understanding of the genetic etiology of breast cancer subtypes, particularly for TNBC. Significance: The discovery of subtype-informative genetic risk variants for breast cancer advances our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer, which could accelerate the identification of targets and personalized strategies for prevention and treatment.
乳腺癌包括几种具有不同特征的生物学、病理学和临床特征的亚型。阐明特定亚型的遗传病因可能会深入了解乳腺癌的异质性,从而促进改进预防和治疗方法的发展。在这项研究中,我们应用病例对照全基因组关联研究(CC-GWAS)方法,对乳腺癌协会联盟的汇总统计数据进行了五种乳腺癌亚型的病例对照比较。该方法确定了 13 个统计学上显著的位点和 8 个提示性的位点,其中大多数是在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和 luminal A 乳腺癌之间的比较中发现的。在考虑到先前报道的乳腺癌易感性变异后,12 个位点的主要变异仍然具有统计学意义,其中 2 个具有全基因组显著性。精细映射暗示了几个位点的潜在功能/因果变异和风险基因,例如 3q26.31/TNFSF10、8q22.3/NACAP1/GRHL2 和 8q23.3/LINC00536/TRPS1,与 luminal 癌症相比,这些基因与 TNBC 有关。功能研究进一步确定了 8q22.3 上的 rs16867605 是调节 GRHL2 增强子活性的 SNP。衍生出了具有亚型信息的多基因风险评分(PRS),并且具有高亚型信息 PRS 的患者患 TNBC 的风险增加了一倍,而不是 luminal 癌症。在调整了来自癌症基因组图谱和非洲裔乳腺癌遗传联盟的传统病例对照 GWAS 中衍生的 TNBC PRS 后,CC-GWAS PRS 仍然具有统计学意义。CC-GWAS PRS 还与乳腺癌患者的总生存和疾病特异性生存相关。总体而言,这些发现推进了我们对乳腺癌亚型遗传病因的理解,特别是对 TNBC。意义:发现乳腺癌的具有亚型信息的遗传风险变异,推进了我们对乳腺癌病因异质性的理解,这可能会加速预防和治疗目标和个性化策略的确定。