Second Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 10;42(23):2780-2789. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00278. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety.
In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity.
The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.
我们评估了奥氮平(一种神经激肽-1 受体拮抗剂[RA])、5-羟色胺-3(5-HT)RA 和地塞米松联合止吐预防接受含卡铂化疗的患者化疗诱导性恶心和呕吐的疗效和安全性。
计划接受卡铂(AUC≥5)化疗的化疗初治患者被随机分配接受奥氮平 5mg 每日一次(奥氮平组)或安慰剂(安慰剂组)联合阿瑞匹坦、5-HT RA 和地塞米松。主要终点是总体阶段(0-120 小时)的完全缓解(CR;无呕吐和无解救治疗)率。次要终点包括无恶心的患者比例和安全性。
共有 355 名患者(78.6%为男性,中位年龄 72 岁,100%为胸部癌症),奥氮平组和安慰剂组分别有 175 名和 180 名患者。奥氮平组的总体 CR 率为 86.9%,安慰剂组为 80.6%。两组总体 CR 率的差异为 6.3%(95%CI,-1.3 至 13.9)。奥氮平组患者在总体(奥氮平组无化疗诱导性恶心的比例为 88.6%,安慰剂组为 75.0%)和延迟(奥氮平组为 89.7%,安慰剂组为 75.6%)阶段无化疗诱导性恶心的比例均显著高于安慰剂组(均<0.001)。奥氮平组和安慰剂组分别有 43(24.6%)和 41(22.9%)名患者出现嗜睡,且无任何事件的严重程度为≥3 级。
奥氮平的加入与总体 CR 率的显著增加无关。关于恶心的预防,在接受含卡铂化疗的患者中添加奥氮平可提供更好的控制,这需要进一步探索。