Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China; Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Province, Dalian, China.
Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China; Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Province, Dalian, China.
Cortex. 2024 Aug;177:37-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 28.
Fearful, angry, and disgusted facial expressions are evolutionarily salient and convey different types of threat signals. However, it remains unclear whether these three expressions impact sensory perception and attention in the same way. The present ERP study investigated the temporal dynamics underlying the processing of different types of threatening faces and the impact of attentional resources employed during a perceptual load task. Participants were asked to judge the length of bars superimposed over faces presented in the center of the screen. A mass univariate statistical approach was used to analyze the EEG data. Behaviorally, task accuracy was significantly reduced following exposure to fearful faces relative to neutral distractors, independent of perceptual load. The ERP results revealed that the P1 amplitude over the right hemisphere was found to be enhanced for fearful relative to disgusted faces, reflecting the rapid and coarse detection of fearful cues. The N170 responses elicited by fearful, angry, and disgusted faces were larger than those elicited by neutral faces, suggesting the largely automatic and preferential processing of threats. Furthermore, the early posterior negativity (EPN) component yielded increased responses to fearful and angry faces, indicating prioritized attention to stimuli representing acute threats. Additionally, perceptual load exerted a pronounced influence on the EPN and late positive potential (LPP), with larger responses observed in the low perceptual load condition, indicating goal-directed cognitive processing. Overall, the early sensory processing of fearful, angry, and disgusted faces is characterized by differential sensitivity in capturing attention automatically, despite the importance of these facial signals for survival. Fearful faces produce a strong interference effect and are processed with higher priority than angry and disgusted ones.
恐惧、愤怒和厌恶的面部表情在进化上是显著的,传达了不同类型的威胁信号。然而,目前尚不清楚这三种表情是否以相同的方式影响感觉知觉和注意力。本 ERP 研究调查了不同类型的威胁面孔处理背后的时间动态,以及在感知负载任务中使用的注意力资源的影响。参与者被要求判断叠加在屏幕中央呈现的面孔上的条的长度。使用大规模单变量统计方法分析 EEG 数据。行为上,与中性分心物相比,暴露于恐惧面孔后,任务准确性显著降低,而与感知负载无关。ERP 结果表明,与厌恶面孔相比,右半球的 P1 振幅增强,反映了对恐惧线索的快速和粗略检测。与中性面孔相比,恐惧、愤怒和厌恶面孔诱发的 N170 反应更大,表明对威胁的自动和优先处理。此外,早期后负电位 (EPN) 成分对恐惧和愤怒面孔产生更大的反应,表明对代表急性威胁的刺激优先注意。此外,感知负载对 EPN 和晚期正电位 (LPP) 产生显著影响,在低感知负载条件下观察到更大的反应,表明目标导向的认知处理。总的来说,尽管这些面部信号对生存很重要,但恐惧、愤怒和厌恶面孔的早期感觉处理表现出自动捕捉注意力的不同敏感性。恐惧面孔产生强烈的干扰效应,并比愤怒和厌恶面孔更优先处理。