Wang Theresa N, Woelfel Ingrid A, Huang Emily, Pieper Heidi, Meara Michael P, Chen Xiaodong Phoenix
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA.
Heliyon. 2024 May 22;10(11):e31691. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31691. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized and common in general surgery training programs. This study sought to better understand the factors that influence resident operative autonomy in robotic surgery. We hypothesized that resident seniority, surgeon work experience, surgeon robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) case volume, and procedure type influence general surgery residents' opportunities for autonomy in RAS as measured by percentage of resident individual console time (ICT).
General surgery resident ICT data for robotic cholecystectomy (RC), inguinal hernia (RIH), and ventral hernia (RVH) operations performed on the dual-console Da Vinci surgical robotic system between July 2019 and June 2021 were extracted. Cases with postgraduate year (PGY) 2-5 residents participating as a console surgeon were included. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was undertaken to explore the ICT results and we conducted secondary qualitative interviews with surgeons. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied.
Resident ICT data from 420 robotic cases (IH 200, RC 121, and VH 99) performed by 20 junior residents (PGY2-3), 18 senior residents (PGY4-5), and 9 attending surgeons were extracted. The average ICT per case was 26.8 % for junior residents and 42.4 % for senior residents. Compared to early-career surgeons, surgeons with over 10 years' work experience gave less ICT to junior (18.2 % vs. 32.0 %) and senior residents (33.9 % vs. 56.6 %) respectively. Surgeons' RAS case volume had no correlation with resident ICT (r = 0.003, p = 0.0003). On average, residents had the most ICT in RC (45.8 %), followed by RIH (36.7 %) and RVH (28.6 %). Interviews with surgeons revealed two potential reasons for these resident ICT patterns: 1) Surgeon assessment of resident training year/experience influenced decisions to grant ICT; 2) Surgeons' perceived operative time pressure inversely affected resident ICT.
This study suggests resident ICT/autonomy in RC, RIH, and RVH are influenced by resident seniority level, surgeon work experience, and procedure type, but not related to surgeon RAS case volume. Design and implementation of an effective robotic training program must consider the external pressures at conflict with increased resident operative autonomy and seek to mitigate them.
机器人手术在普通外科培训项目中的应用日益广泛且常见。本研究旨在更好地了解影响住院医师在机器人手术中操作自主性的因素。我们假设住院医师的资历、外科医生的工作经验、外科医生的机器人辅助手术(RAS)病例数量以及手术类型会影响普通外科住院医师在RAS中的自主机会,以住院医师个人控制台时间(ICT)的百分比来衡量。
提取了2019年7月至2021年6月期间在双控制台达芬奇手术机器人系统上进行的机器人胆囊切除术(RC)、腹股沟疝修补术(RIH)和腹疝修补术(RVH)手术的普通外科住院医师ICT数据。纳入了研究生二年级至五年级(PGY2 - 5)的住院医师作为控制台外科医生参与的病例。采用顺序解释性混合方法来探究ICT结果,并对外科医生进行了二次定性访谈。应用了描述性统计和主题分析。
提取了由20名初级住院医师(PGY2 - 3)、18名高级住院医师(PGY4 - 5)和9名主治医生进行的420例机器人手术(IH 200例、RC 121例和VH 99例)的住院医师ICT数据。初级住院医师每例的平均ICT为26.8%,高级住院医师为42.4%。与早期职业生涯的外科医生相比,工作经验超过10年的外科医生分别给予初级住院医师(18.2%对32.0%)和高级住院医师(33.9%对56.6%)的ICT较少。外科医生的RAS病例数量与住院医师ICT无相关性(r = 0.003,p = 0.0003)。平均而言,住院医师在RC手术中的ICT最多(45.8%),其次是RIH(36.7%)和RVH(28.6%)。对外科医生的访谈揭示了这些住院医师ICT模式的两个潜在原因:1)外科医生对住院医师培训年份/经验的评估影响了给予ICT的决定;2)外科医生感知到的手术时间压力对住院医师ICT产生反向影响。
本研究表明,住院医师在RC、RIH和RVH手术中的ICT/自主性受住院医师资历水平、外科医生工作经验和手术类型的影响,但与外科医生的RAS病例数量无关。有效的机器人培训项目的设计和实施必须考虑与增加住院医师操作自主性相冲突的外部压力,并寻求缓解这些压力。