Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning, China.
Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang Hubei, China.
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):465-474. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.465. eCollection 2024 Jun.
This study aimed to identify the optimal surface for sprint interval training to maximize transfer effects on physical performance measures on the grass pitch. Using a randomized controlled trial design, 40 collegiate female soccer players were equally assigned to three experimental groups performing short sprint interval training (SSIT: 4 sets of 10 repetitions with 5 seconds all-out running, with a 50-second recovery period between each effort and a 3-minute rest interval between sets) on SAND, GRASS, LAND, and a control group. Before and after a 7-week training period, participants underwent a series of field-based tests to evaluate countermovement jump (CMJ), 20-m linear sprint, Illinois change of direction (CoD) speed, Yo-Yo IR1, 2.4 km time trial, and maximal kicking distance (MKD) performance. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was conducted on the data, along with Bonferroni post hoc testing. After the intervention, the control group did not show any changes, while the SAND, GRASS and LAND training groups demonstrated improvements (p = 0.001) in their performance as follows: CMJ (effect size [ES] = 1.21, 0.97, 0.64), 20-m linear sprint (ES = -0.81, -0.55, -0.41), Illinois CoD (ES = -0.72, -0.79, -0.41), Yo-Yo IR1 (ES = 1.86, 1.19, 1.12), 2.4 km time trail (ES = -0.82, -0.62, -0.49), and MKD (ES = 0.60, 0.90, 0.72), respectively. Comparative analysis of SAND, GRASS, and LAND revealed that performing SSIT on SAND results in a significantly greater gain in CMJ than LAND (p = 0.041). Analyzing individual responses to training interventions indicated that the training surface had a favorable influence on CMJ (SAND vs. LAND, p = 0.009), but on other variables no statistically significant (p > 0.05) differences were observed. Considering these findings, it is advised that strength and conditioning coaches use the SAND surface as the initial choice for SSIT sessions regarding greater gains (i.e., ES) in performance. This recommendation aims to facilitate more favorable transfer in physical fitness adaptation on a soccer grass pitch. In case of unavailability of SAND surface, GRASS surface would be a suitable alternative to enhance the physical fitness of collegiate female soccer players.
本研究旨在确定最佳的表面进行短跑间歇训练,以最大限度地提高在草地球场上的体能表现测量的转移效果。采用随机对照试验设计,将 40 名大学女子足球运动员平均分配到三个实验组,进行短距离间歇训练(SSIT:4 组 10 次重复,全力跑 5 秒,每组之间有 50 秒恢复期,每组之间有 3 分钟休息期)在 SAND、GRASS、LAND 上,以及对照组。在 7 周的训练期前后,参与者接受了一系列基于场地的测试,以评估纵跳(CMJ)、20 米直线冲刺、伊利诺伊变向(CoD)速度、Yo-Yo IR1、2.4 公里计时赛和最大踢球距离(MKD)表现。对数据进行了双向重复测量方差分析,并进行了 Bonferroni 事后检验。干预后,对照组没有任何变化,而 SAND、GRASS 和 LAND 训练组在以下方面表现出改善(p=0.001):CMJ(效应量[ES]为 1.21、0.97、0.64)、20 米直线冲刺(ES=-0.81、-0.55、-0.41)、伊利诺伊 CoD(ES=-0.72、-0.79、-0.41)、Yo-Yo IR1(ES=1.86、1.19、1.12)、2.4 公里计时赛(ES=-0.82、-0.62、-0.49)和 MKD(ES=0.60、0.90、0.72)。对 SAND、GRASS 和 LAND 的比较分析表明,在 SAND 上进行 SSIT 比在 LAND 上获得的 CMJ 增益明显更大(p=0.041)。对训练干预的个体反应分析表明,训练表面对 CMJ(SAND 与 LAND,p=0.009)有有利影响,但对其他变量没有观察到统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。考虑到这些发现,建议力量和体能教练将 SAND 表面作为 SSIT 课程的首选,以获得更大的表现增益(即 ES)。这一建议旨在促进足球草地球场上更有利的身体素质适应转移。如果无法使用 SAND 表面,GRASS 表面将是增强大学女子足球运动员身体素质的合适替代选择。