Suppr超能文献

制衡:儿童功能性姿势控制测试在已知群体有效性的元分析。

Checks and balances: a meta-analysis on the known-groups validity of functional postural control tests in children.

机构信息

Unit of Pediatric Rehabilitation Research of Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Rehabilitation Research Center (REVAL), Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;60(4):656-670. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08187-5. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric physical therapists commonly treat children with postural control deficits. Ideally, pediatric functional postural control tests should therefore be able to identify postural control deficits in children with various disorders. Despite a plethora of available tests, evidence for their validity - especially known-groups - remains scarce. This review aims to determine the known-group validity of available functional postural control tests to differentiate various pediatric pathological groups of different ages from their typically developing (TD) peers.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were systematically searched (last update: February 2023; PROSPERO: CRD42023408982). Forty case-control studies with a pathological pediatric sample (N.=1331) and TD peers (N.=1889) were included and selected for data-extraction and -analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the SIGN checklist and level of evidence was scored using GRADE. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) for the various test types and subclassified based on pathology and/or age.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

When compared with TD peers, children with underlying pathologies performed significantly worse on pediatric functional postural control test batteries (SMD=-2.21), the Timed Up and Go Test and variants (SMD=2.30), the One Leg Stance test and variants (SMD=-2.14), while the Reach tests showed a smaller difference (SMD=-1.19). Subclassification within the meta-analyses showed that pathology was an influencing factor for the test batteries and the one leg stance test and variants. Age was an influencing factor for the reach tests. None of the included functional postural control tests exceeded a low level of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric functional postural control tests that assess multiple aspects of postural control (such as test batteries) seem to offer higher known-groups validity than single-task tests (e.g. reach tests). The underlying pathology has a larger impact on the validity of these tests than age. There remains an overall low level of evidence for the known-groups validity of pediatric functional postural control tests indicating the need for research with more homogenous groups and norm reference data.

摘要

简介

儿科物理治疗师通常治疗姿势控制缺陷的儿童。理想情况下,儿科功能性姿势控制测试应该能够识别出各种疾病儿童的姿势控制缺陷。尽管有大量可用的测试,但它们的有效性证据,特别是已知组的证据仍然很少。本综述旨在确定可用的功能性姿势控制测试的已知组有效性,以区分不同年龄的各种儿科病理组与他们的典型发育(TD)同龄人。

证据获取

系统地检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus(最后更新:2023 年 2 月;PROSPERO:CRD42023408982)。纳入了 40 项病例对照研究,其中包括有病理儿科样本(N=1331)和 TD 同龄人(N=1889),并选择用于数据提取和分析。使用 SIGN 清单评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评分评估证据水平。进行随机效应荟萃分析,以估计各种测试类型的汇总标准化均数差(SMD),并根据病理学和/或年龄进行分类。

证据综合

与 TD 同龄人相比,患有潜在疾病的儿童在儿科功能性姿势控制测试组合(SMD=-2.21)、计时起立行走测试和变体(SMD=2.30)、单腿站立测试和变体(SMD=-2.14)方面表现明显更差,而伸展测试显示出较小的差异(SMD=-1.19)。荟萃分析中的分类表明,病理学是测试组合和单腿站立测试和变体的影响因素。年龄是伸展测试的影响因素。没有一项包括的功能性姿势控制测试超过低水平的证据。

结论

评估姿势控制多个方面的儿科功能性姿势控制测试(例如测试组合)似乎比单项任务测试(例如伸展测试)具有更高的已知组有效性。潜在的病理学对这些测试的有效性有更大的影响,而年龄的影响较小。儿科功能性姿势控制测试的已知组有效性的总体证据水平仍然较低,表明需要对同质性更强的群体和规范参考数据进行研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce8/11407102/78aa68369a63/8187-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验