• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗推出后控制 COVID-19 大流行的非药物干预措施:系统评价。

Non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing COVID-19 pandemic after the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Nanchang University, No. 461, Bayi Ave,, Nanchang, 330006, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1524. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18980-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-18980-2
PMID:38844867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11157849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been widely utilised to control the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unclear what the optimal strategies are for implementing NPIs in the context of coronavirus vaccines. This study aims to systematically identify, describe, and evaluate existing ecological studies on the real-world impact of NPIs in containing COVID-19 pandemic following the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of relevant studies from January 1, 2021, to June 4, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, Web of science and MedRxiv. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted the data. A risk of bias assessment tool, derived from a bibliometric review of ecological studies, was applied to evaluate the study design, statistical methodology, and the quality of reporting. Data were collected, synthesised and analysed using qualitative and quantitative methods. The results were presented using summary tables and figures, including information on the target countries and regions of the studies, types of NPIs, and the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

The review included a total of 17 studies that examined the real-world impact of NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic after the vaccine roll-out. These studies used five composite indicators that combined multiple NPIs, and examined 14 individual NPIs. The studies had an average quality assessment score of 13 (range: 10-16), indicating moderately high quality. NPIs had a larger impact than vaccination in mitigating the spread of COVID-19 during the early stage of the vaccination implementation and in the context of the Omicron variant. Testing policies, workplace closures, and restrictions on gatherings were the most effective NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic, following the roll-out of vaccines. The impact of NPIs varied across different time frames, countries and regions.

CONCLUSION

NPIs had a larger contribution to the control of the pandemic as compared to vaccination during the early stage of vaccine implementation and in the context of the omicron variant. The impact of NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic exhibited variability in diverse contexts. Policy- and decision-makers need to focus on the impact of different NPIs in diverse contexts. Further research is needed to understand the policy mechanisms and address potential future challenges.

摘要

背景

非药物干预(NPIs)已被广泛用于控制 COVID-19 大流行。然而,在冠状病毒疫苗推出的背景下,实施 NPIs 的最佳策略尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统地识别、描述和评估现有的关于 NPIs 在冠状病毒疫苗推出后控制 COVID-19 大流行的真实世界影响的生态研究。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 MedRxiv 上进行了全面检索,检索时间为 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 4 日。两名作者独立评估研究的合格性并提取数据。使用源自生态研究文献计量学审查的风险偏倚评估工具来评估研究设计、统计方法和报告质量。使用定性和定量方法收集、综合和分析数据。使用摘要表和图表展示结果,包括研究的目标国家和地区、NPIs 的类型以及证据质量的信息。

结果

综述共纳入了 17 项研究,这些研究考察了疫苗推出后 NPIs 在控制 COVID-19 大流行方面的真实世界影响。这些研究使用了五个综合指标,综合了多种 NPIs,并考察了 14 种单独的 NPIs。研究的平均质量评估得分为 13 分(范围:10-16 分),表明质量较高。在疫苗实施的早期阶段和奥密克戎变体流行期间,NPIs 在减轻 COVID-19 的传播方面比疫苗更有效。在疫苗推出后,检测政策、工作场所关闭和集会限制是控制 COVID-19 大流行最有效的 NPIs。NPIs 的影响因不同的时间框架、国家和地区而异。

结论

在疫苗实施的早期阶段和奥密克戎变体流行期间,NPIs 对控制大流行的贡献比疫苗更大。在不同背景下,NPIs 对控制 COVID-19 大流行的影响存在差异。政策制定者和决策者需要关注不同背景下不同 NPIs 的影响。需要进一步研究以了解政策机制并应对潜在的未来挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6588/11157849/a8170fa66e48/12889_2024_18980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6588/11157849/ae35ff2d0698/12889_2024_18980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6588/11157849/a8170fa66e48/12889_2024_18980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6588/11157849/ae35ff2d0698/12889_2024_18980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6588/11157849/a8170fa66e48/12889_2024_18980_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing COVID-19 pandemic after the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines: a systematic review.疫苗推出后控制 COVID-19 大流行的非药物干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1524. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18980-2.
2
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission across 130 countries and territories.非药物干预措施对 130 个国家和地区的 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01872-8.
3
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, vaccination, and the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in England: a mathematical modelling study.非药物干预措施、疫苗接种和 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔变异株在英国:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 13;398(10313):1825-1835. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02276-5. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions following the COVID-19 pandemic - the quiet before the storm?解除新冠肺炎大流行后的非药物干预措施——暴风雨前的宁静?
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Nov;21(11):1541-1553. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2117693. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
5
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.旅行相关的控制措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.
6
Factors Associated with the Implementation of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Reducing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review.与实施非药物干预措施降低 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8):4274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084274.
7
Untangling the changing impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination on European COVID-19 trajectories.厘清非药物干预措施和疫苗接种对欧洲 COVID-19 传播轨迹的变化影响。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 3;13(1):3106. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30897-1.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Unintended Consequences of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) for Population Health and Health Inequalities.COVID-19 非药物干预(NPIs)对人口健康和健康不平等的意外后果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;20(7):5223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075223.
10
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination on COVID-19 outbreaks in Nunavut, Canada: a Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) study.加拿大努纳武特地区非药物干预和疫苗接种对 COVID-19 疫情的影响:加拿大免疫研究网络(CIRN)研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 25;22(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13432-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in HIV incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-22) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2015-19) in Peru: An observational study.秘鲁2019冠状病毒病大流行期间(2020 - 2022年)与大流行前时期(2015 - 2019年)相比的艾滋病毒发病率变化:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0324784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324784. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Condition-Dependent and Dynamic Impacts of Indoor Masking Policies for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mitigation: A Nationwide, Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.条件相关且动态的室内口罩政策对 2019 年冠状病毒病缓解的影响:一项全国范围的、中断时间序列分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 26;77(2):203-211. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad115.
2
Impacts of social distancing policy and vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间社交距离政策和疫苗接种的影响。
J Econ Dyn Control. 2023 May;150:104642. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104642. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions, weather, vaccination, and variants on COVID-19 transmission across departments in France.
非药物干预措施、天气、疫苗接种和变异对法国各部门 COVID-19 传播的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08106-1.
4
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
Association between face covering policies and the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 in European countries.欧洲国家面部遮盖政策与2019冠状病毒病发病率之间的关联。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2023 Feb;14(1):31-39. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0287. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Variation in Global Policy Responses to COVID-19: A Bidirectional Analysis.全球应对 COVID-19 政策的差异:双向分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054252.
7
The global dynamic transmissibility of COVID-19 and its influencing factors: an analysis of control measures from 176 countries.COVID-19 的全球动态传播力及其影响因素:来自 176 个国家的控制措施分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15174-0.
8
Impact of mass rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 to mitigate Omicron outbreaks in China.大规模抗原快速检测对缓解中国奥密克戎疫情的影响。
J Travel Med. 2022 Dec 27;29(8). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac110.
9
Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants BA.1 to BA.5: Implications for immune escape and transmission.奥密克戎变异株 BA.1 至 BA.5 的进化:免疫逃逸和传播的影响。
Rev Med Virol. 2022 Sep;32(5):e2381. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2381. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10
Untangling the changing impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination on European COVID-19 trajectories.厘清非药物干预措施和疫苗接种对欧洲 COVID-19 传播轨迹的变化影响。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 3;13(1):3106. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30897-1.