Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Nanchang University, No. 461, Bayi Ave,, Nanchang, 330006, PR China.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1524. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18980-2.
Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been widely utilised to control the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unclear what the optimal strategies are for implementing NPIs in the context of coronavirus vaccines. This study aims to systematically identify, describe, and evaluate existing ecological studies on the real-world impact of NPIs in containing COVID-19 pandemic following the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines.
We conducted a comprehensive search of relevant studies from January 1, 2021, to June 4, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, Web of science and MedRxiv. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted the data. A risk of bias assessment tool, derived from a bibliometric review of ecological studies, was applied to evaluate the study design, statistical methodology, and the quality of reporting. Data were collected, synthesised and analysed using qualitative and quantitative methods. The results were presented using summary tables and figures, including information on the target countries and regions of the studies, types of NPIs, and the quality of evidence.
The review included a total of 17 studies that examined the real-world impact of NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic after the vaccine roll-out. These studies used five composite indicators that combined multiple NPIs, and examined 14 individual NPIs. The studies had an average quality assessment score of 13 (range: 10-16), indicating moderately high quality. NPIs had a larger impact than vaccination in mitigating the spread of COVID-19 during the early stage of the vaccination implementation and in the context of the Omicron variant. Testing policies, workplace closures, and restrictions on gatherings were the most effective NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic, following the roll-out of vaccines. The impact of NPIs varied across different time frames, countries and regions.
NPIs had a larger contribution to the control of the pandemic as compared to vaccination during the early stage of vaccine implementation and in the context of the omicron variant. The impact of NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic exhibited variability in diverse contexts. Policy- and decision-makers need to focus on the impact of different NPIs in diverse contexts. Further research is needed to understand the policy mechanisms and address potential future challenges.
非药物干预(NPIs)已被广泛用于控制 COVID-19 大流行。然而,在冠状病毒疫苗推出的背景下,实施 NPIs 的最佳策略尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统地识别、描述和评估现有的关于 NPIs 在冠状病毒疫苗推出后控制 COVID-19 大流行的真实世界影响的生态研究。
我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 MedRxiv 上进行了全面检索,检索时间为 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 4 日。两名作者独立评估研究的合格性并提取数据。使用源自生态研究文献计量学审查的风险偏倚评估工具来评估研究设计、统计方法和报告质量。使用定性和定量方法收集、综合和分析数据。使用摘要表和图表展示结果,包括研究的目标国家和地区、NPIs 的类型以及证据质量的信息。
综述共纳入了 17 项研究,这些研究考察了疫苗推出后 NPIs 在控制 COVID-19 大流行方面的真实世界影响。这些研究使用了五个综合指标,综合了多种 NPIs,并考察了 14 种单独的 NPIs。研究的平均质量评估得分为 13 分(范围:10-16 分),表明质量较高。在疫苗实施的早期阶段和奥密克戎变体流行期间,NPIs 在减轻 COVID-19 的传播方面比疫苗更有效。在疫苗推出后,检测政策、工作场所关闭和集会限制是控制 COVID-19 大流行最有效的 NPIs。NPIs 的影响因不同的时间框架、国家和地区而异。
在疫苗实施的早期阶段和奥密克戎变体流行期间,NPIs 对控制大流行的贡献比疫苗更大。在不同背景下,NPIs 对控制 COVID-19 大流行的影响存在差异。政策制定者和决策者需要关注不同背景下不同 NPIs 的影响。需要进一步研究以了解政策机制并应对潜在的未来挑战。