Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences (IBACS), University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Behav Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 1;35(5):269-279. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000780. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
Excessive prescribing and misuse of prescription opioids, such as oxycodone, significantly contributed to the current opioid crisis. Although oxycodone is typically consumed orally by humans, parenteral routes of administration have primarily been used in preclinical models of oxycodone dependence. To address this issue, more recent studies have used oral self-administration procedures to study oxycodone seeking and withdrawal in rodents. Behavioral differences, however, following oral oxycodone intake versus parenteral oxycodone administration remain unclear. Thus, the goal of the current studies was to compare anxiety- and withdrawal-like behaviors using established opioid dependence models of either home cage oral intake of oxycodone (0.5 mg/ml) or repeated subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of oxycodone (10 mg/kg) in male and female mice. Here, mice received 10 days of oral or s.c. oxycodone administration, and following 72 h of forced abstinence, anxiety- and withdrawal-like behaviors were measured using elevated zero maze, open field, and naloxone-induced precipitated withdrawal procedures. Global withdrawal scores were increased to a similar degree following oral and s.c. oxycodone use, while both routes of oxycodone administration had minimal effects on anxiety-like behaviors. When examining individual withdrawal-like behaviors, mice receiving s.c. oxycodone exhibited more paw tremors and jumps during naloxone-induced precipitated withdrawal compared with oral oxycodone mice. These results indicate that both models of oxycodone administration are sufficient to elevate global withdrawal scores, but, when compared with oral consumption, s.c. oxycodone injections yielded more pronounced effects on some withdrawal-like behaviors.
过量开具和滥用处方类阿片药物,如羟考酮,是造成当前阿片类药物危机的重要原因。虽然羟考酮通常被人类口服使用,但在羟考酮依赖的临床前模型中,主要使用的是注射给药途径。为了解决这个问题,最近的研究使用口服自我给药程序来研究啮齿动物对羟考酮的觅药和戒断反应。然而,口服羟考酮摄入与注射羟考酮给药后出现的行为差异尚不清楚。因此,目前的研究目标是使用已建立的阿片类药物依赖模型,比较口服摄入羟考酮(0.5mg/ml)或反复皮下(sc)注射羟考酮(10mg/kg)的雄性和雌性小鼠的焦虑和戒断样行为。在这里,小鼠接受了 10 天的口服或 sc 羟考酮给药,在 72 小时的强制戒断后,使用高架十字迷宫、旷场和纳洛酮诱发的戒断程序测量焦虑和戒断样行为。口服和 sc 羟考酮使用后,全身戒断评分增加到相似程度,而羟考酮的两种给药途径对焦虑样行为的影响都很小。当检查个别戒断样行为时,与口服羟考酮的小鼠相比,接受 sc 羟考酮的小鼠在纳洛酮诱发的戒断时表现出更多的爪震颤和跳跃。这些结果表明,羟考酮的两种给药方式都足以提高全身戒断评分,但与口服相比,sc 羟考酮注射对一些戒断样行为的影响更为明显。