Suppr超能文献

神经内镜血肿清除术联合脑室灌洗治疗重症脑室出血的疗效分析——一项前瞻性随机对照研究

Analysis of the Efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Hematoma Removal Combined With Ventricular Lavage in Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

作者信息

Qu Xinguo, Luo Junjie, Zhang Ke, Wang Chengmou

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan , Hubei , China.

Neurological Intensive Care Unit, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan , Hubei , China.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2024 Dec 1;95(6):1297-1306. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003018. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The current widely utilized clinical approach for severe intraventricular hemorrhage involves ventriculostomy with supportive drainage. The aim of our study was to evaluate the overall efficacy of neuroendoscopic hematoma removal combined with ventricular lavage as a treatment approach for severe intraventricular hemorrhage.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted, selecting a total of 98 patients with severe intraventricular hemorrhage at our hospital from February 2021 to November 2022. The patients were randomly distributed into 2 groups using a randomized number table method: the neuroendoscopic group (undergoing neuroendoscopic hematoma removal combined with ventricular lavage) and the control group (undergoing intraventricular trepanation and drainage), with 49 patients in each group.

RESULTS

The neuroendoscopic group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss than that of the control group ( P = .037), while the drainage tube indwelling time and hospital stay in the neuroendoscopic group were significantly shorter ( P < .001). At 6 hours ( P = .021), 1 day ( P = .002), 3 days ( P < .001) and 7 days ( P = .007) following surgery, the neuroendoscopic group exhibited evidently higher hematoma clearance rates compared with the control group. At 1 day and 3 days after surgery, the cerebrospinal fluid drainage volume in the neuroendoscopic group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P < .001), whereas at 7 days after surgery, it was significantly lower in the neuroendoscopic group compared with the control group ( P < .001). Moreover, significantly lower incidence of intracranial infection ( P = .045) and increased intracranial pressure ( P = .008) was observed in the neuroendoscopic group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

Neuroendoscopic hematoma removal combined with ventricle lavage emerged as an effective treatment strategy for severe intraventricular hemorrhage, yielding significant therapeutic benefits. Therefore, this approach holds promise for broader clinical application and promotion.

摘要

背景与目的

目前广泛应用于严重脑室内出血的临床方法是脑室造瘘并辅以引流。本研究的目的是评估神经内镜血肿清除术联合脑室灌洗作为严重脑室内出血治疗方法的总体疗效。

方法

进行一项前瞻性随机对照研究,选取2021年2月至2022年11月我院共98例严重脑室内出血患者。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为2组:神经内镜组(行神经内镜血肿清除术联合脑室灌洗)和对照组(行脑室钻孔引流术),每组49例。

结果

神经内镜组术中出血量显著高于对照组(P = 0.037),而神经内镜组引流管留置时间和住院时间显著缩短(P < 0.001)。术后6小时(P = 0.021)、1天(P = 0.002)、3天(P < 0.001)和7天(P = 0.007),神经内镜组血肿清除率明显高于对照组。术后1天和3天,神经内镜组脑脊液引流量显著高于对照组(P < 0.001),而术后7天,神经内镜组脑脊液引流量显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,神经内镜组颅内感染(P = 0.045)和颅内压升高(P = 0.008)的发生率显著降低。

结论

神经内镜血肿清除术联合脑室灌洗是治疗严重脑室内出血的有效治疗策略,具有显著的治疗效果。因此,该方法具有广阔的临床应用和推广前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验