Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Serviço de Nefrologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):1061-1072. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000508. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
Accurate assessment of GFR is crucial to guiding drug eligibility, dosing of systemic therapy, and minimizing the risks of both undertreatment and toxicity in patients with cancer. Up to 32% of patients with cancer have baseline CKD, and both malignancy and treatment may cause kidney injury and subsequent CKD. To date, there has been lack of guidance to standardize approaches to GFR estimation in the cancer population. In this two-part statement from the American Society of Onco-Nephrology, we present key messages for estimation of GFR in patients with cancer, including the choice of GFR estimating equation, use of race and body surface area adjustment, and anticancer drug dose-adjustment in the setting of CKD. These key messages are based on a systematic review of studies assessing GFR estimating equations using serum creatinine and cystatin C in patients with cancer, against a measured GFR comparator. The preponderance of current data involving validated GFR estimating equations involves the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations, with 2508 patients in whom CKD-EPI using serum creatinine and cystatin C was assessed (eight studies) and 15,349 in whom CKD-EPI with serum creatinine was assessed (22 studies). The former may have improved performance metrics and be less susceptible to shortfalls of eGFR using serum creatinine alone. Since included studies were moderate quality or lower, the American Society of Onco-Nephrology Position Committee rated the certainty of evidence as low. Additional studies are needed to assess the accuracy of other validated eGFR equations in patients with cancer. Given the importance of accurate and timely eGFR assessment, we advocate for the use of validated GFR estimating equations incorporating both serum creatinine and cystatin C in patients with cancer. Measurement of GFR via exogenous filtration markers should be considered in patients with cancer for whom eGFR results in borderline eligibility for therapies or clinical trials.
准确评估肾小球滤过率(GFR)对于指导药物的适用性、系统治疗的剂量选择,以及降低癌症患者治疗不足和药物毒性风险至关重要。高达 32%的癌症患者存在基线慢性肾脏病(CKD),恶性肿瘤及其治疗均可导致肾脏损伤和随后的 CKD。迄今为止,癌症患者的 GFR 评估方法缺乏标准化指导。在这篇由美国肿瘤肾病学会(ASN)发布的两部分声明中,我们提出了癌症患者 GFR 评估的关键信息,包括 GFR 估算方程的选择、种族和体表面积校正的应用,以及 CKD 背景下的抗肿瘤药物剂量调整。这些关键信息是基于对使用血清肌酐和胱抑素 C 评估癌症患者 GFR 估算方程的研究进行系统回顾得出的,这些研究均以实测 GFR 为对照。目前涉及验证后的 GFR 估算方程的大多数数据都涉及 CKD 流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)方程,其中有 2508 名患者使用血清肌酐和胱抑素 C 评估 CKD-EPI(8 项研究),15349 名患者使用血清肌酐评估 CKD-EPI(22 项研究)。前者可能具有更好的性能指标,且不太容易受到单独使用血清肌酐估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的不足的影响。由于纳入的研究质量中等或较低,ASN 立场委员会将证据确定性评为低。需要更多的研究来评估其他验证后的 eGFR 方程在癌症患者中的准确性。鉴于准确、及时的 eGFR 评估非常重要,我们主张在癌症患者中使用包含血清肌酐和胱抑素 C 的验证后的 GFR 估算方程。对于那些 eGFR 结果处于治疗或临床试验资格边缘的癌症患者,应考虑使用外源性滤过标志物测量 GFR。