Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, University of Stirling, Pathfoot Building, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Cork, Ireland.
Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 7;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02569-2.
Despite growing interest in workplace mental health interventions, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. Implementation science offers a valuable lens to investigate the factors influencing successful implementation. However, evidence synthesis is lacking, especially for small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and for specific work sectors. The objectives of this review are to establish the scope of research with explicit analysis of implementation aspects of workplace mental health interventions and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation in general and within SMEs and selected sectors.
A systematic scoping review and meta-synthesis of mixed methods process evaluation research from 11 databases, with the evaluation of methodological quality (MMAT) and confidence in findings (CERQual), was conducted. We selected information-rich studies and synthesised them using domains within the Nielsen and Randall implementation framework: context, intervention activities, implementation; and mental models.
We included 43 studies published between 2009 and 2022, of which 22 were rated as information-rich to be analysed for barriers and facilitators. Most studies were conducted in healthcare. Facilitators reflecting 'high confidence' included: relevant and tailored content, continuous and pro-active leadership buy-in and support, internal or external change agents/champions, assistance from managers and peers, resources, and senior-level experience and awareness of mental health issues. Healthcare sector-specific facilitators included: easy accessibility with time provided, fostering relationships, clear communication, and perceptions of the intervention. Stigma and confidentiality issues were reported as barriers overall. Due to the small number of studies within SMEs reported findings did not reach 'high confidence'. A lack of studies in construction and Information and Communication Technology meant separate analyses were not possible.
There is dependable evidence of key factors for the implementation of workplace mental health interventions which should be used to improve implementation. However, there is a lack of studies in SMEs and in a larger variety of sectors.
Research Registry ( reviewregistry897 ).
尽管人们对工作场所心理健康干预措施越来越感兴趣,但这些措施的有效性证据却参差不齐。实施科学为研究影响成功实施的因素提供了一个有价值的视角。然而,证据综合方面的研究却很少,尤其是在中小型企业(SMEs)和特定工作领域。本研究的目的是确定研究范围,明确分析工作场所心理健康干预措施的实施方面,并确定一般实施以及在中小企业和选定部门实施的障碍和促进因素。
我们对来自 11 个数据库的混合方法过程评估研究进行了系统的范围综述和元综合,并对方法学质量(MMAT)和研究结果可信度(CERQual)进行了评估。我们选择了信息丰富的研究,并使用尼尔森和兰德尔实施框架内的各个领域对其进行综合分析:背景、干预活动、实施;以及心理模型。
我们纳入了 43 项发表于 2009 年至 2022 年的研究,其中 22 项被评为信息丰富,可用于分析障碍和促进因素。大多数研究都在医疗保健领域进行。反映“高度可信”的促进因素包括:相关和量身定制的内容、持续和积极的领导层支持、内部或外部变革推动者/拥护者、经理和同事的帮助、资源以及高级管理层对心理健康问题的经验和意识。医疗保健部门特有的促进因素包括:提供时间,便于获取、培养关系、清晰的沟通以及对干预措施的看法。总的来说,报告了耻辱感和保密性问题是障碍。由于报告的中小企业研究数量较少,因此研究结果未达到“高度可信”。由于在建筑和信息与通信技术领域缺乏研究,因此无法进行单独分析。
有可靠证据表明,实施工作场所心理健康干预措施的关键因素应加以利用,以提高实施效果。然而,中小企业和更多样化的部门的研究却很少。