Suppr超能文献

将 AD8 与 MMSE 相结合进行社区为基础的痴呆筛查。

Combining the AD8 and MMSE for community-based dementia screening.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital Taipei Branch, Taiwan.

Department of Neurology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan.

出版信息

Exp Gerontol. 2024 Sep;194:112482. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112482. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether a cognitive test the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8) instrument applied in combination could improve the accuracy of dementia detection in a community setting.

METHODS

Study participants were recruited from a community-based integrated screening program in Tainan, Taiwan. Participants completed the AD8 and were administered the Chinese version of the MMSE by psychologists. In addition, the presence of dementia was determined by neurologists based on the 2011 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association guidelines. Logistic regression analysis determined whether the combination of these two tests provided any additional information for dementia detection than either test alone. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to explore the performances of different screening modalities in detecting dementia.

RESULT

In total, 282 participants with an average age of 69.31 ± 10.27 years were enrolled. The prevalence of dementia among participants aged ≥65 years was 9.29 %. The sensitivity and specificity of the AD8 applied alone for detecting dementia were 64.71 % and 87.89 %, respectively, and of the MMSE applied alone, after adjusting for education level, were 41.18 % and 84.50 %, respectively. Using a cutoff score of 21 for the MMSE resulted in sensitivity of 77.78 % and specificity of 73.58 %. The AD8 and MMSE when combined in parallel yielded 88.89 % sensitivity and 70.16 % specificity. The serial use of the AD8 followed by the MMSE yielded 50 % sensitivity and 93.02 % specificity. Except for when an MMSE cutoff value of 26 was applied, the sensitivity of all examined modalities was poor and specificity was moderate for detecting mild cognitive impairment. ROC curve analysis revealed that the parallel application of the MMSE and AD8 (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 82.3 % [75.1 %-89.4 %]) resulted in better dementia detection accuracy than the AD8 alone (AUC: 73.3 % [60.7 %-85.9 %]), the MMSE alone (AUC: 77.4 % [67.6 %-87.3 %]), or serial test administration (AUC: 67.6 % [53.4 %-81.8 %]).

CONCLUSION

This study successfully demonstrated that the MMSE and AD8 combination for dementia screening could improve detection accuracy in a community setting.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定认知测试——简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和确定痴呆症 8 项(AD8)工具联合应用是否可以提高社区环境中痴呆症检测的准确性。

方法

研究参与者从台湾台南的一个社区综合筛查计划中招募。参与者完成 AD8 测试,并由心理学家进行中文版 MMSE 测试。此外,神经病学家根据 2011 年国家老龄化-阿尔茨海默病协会指南确定痴呆的存在。逻辑回归分析确定这两种测试的组合是否比单独使用任何一种测试提供了更多的痴呆检测信息。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析用于探索不同筛查模式在检测痴呆症方面的性能。

结果

共有 282 名平均年龄为 69.31 ± 10.27 岁的参与者入组。≥65 岁参与者中痴呆的患病率为 9.29%。AD8 单独用于检测痴呆的敏感性和特异性分别为 64.71%和 87.89%,调整教育水平后,MMSE 单独使用的敏感性和特异性分别为 41.18%和 84.50%。使用 MMSE 的截断值为 21,其敏感性为 77.78%,特异性为 73.58%。AD8 和 MMSE 平行联合使用的敏感性为 88.89%,特异性为 70.16%。AD8 连续使用后再使用 MMSE 的敏感性为 50%,特异性为 93.02%。除了应用 MMSE 截断值为 26 外,所有检测模式的敏感性均较差,特异性为中度,用于检测轻度认知障碍。ROC 曲线分析显示,MMSE 和 AD8 的平行应用(ROC 曲线下面积[AUC]:82.3%[75.1%-89.4%])比 AD8 单独使用(AUC:73.3%[60.7%-85.9%])、MMSE 单独使用(AUC:77.4%[67.6%-87.3%])或连续测试(AUC:67.6%[53.4%-81.8%])的痴呆检测准确性更高。

结论

本研究成功证明,用于痴呆症筛查的 MMSE 和 AD8 联合应用可以提高社区环境中的检测准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验