Discipline of Medicine, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Anatomical Pathology, SA Pathology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
Mod Pathol. 2024 Aug;37(8):100535. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100535. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
The DESTINY Breast-04 trial revealed survival advantages of trastuzumab deruxtecan for women with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (1+ or 2+ immunohistochemistry [IHC], without amplification). Although this trial applied the 2018 Americal Society of Clinial Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 IHC scoring criteria, the subjectivity and imprecision in IHC scoring have raised concerns that patients' treatment may be misaligned. Our group of 9 experienced breast pathologists collated a deidentified set of 60 breast cancer core biopsies from 3 laboratories, evaluated with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay and mostly scored locally as HER2 0 or 1+. Based on ASCO/CAP 2018 criteria and our extensive experience of reporting HER2 IHC, we specified scoring conventions for cancers with low levels of HER2 protein expression, articulating specific scoring pitfalls. Each pathologist then reviewed digitized whole slide images of the IHC slides and scored the HER2 expression for each case. At a subsequent consensus workshop, we reviewed the cases jointly to establish consensus scores for each case and determine the percentage of HER2 expressing tumor cells. Consensus was reached on all cases, with 40 classified as 1+ and 3 as 2+ (not amplified), totaling 43 (71.7%) HER2-low cancers. The remaining cases were HER2 0. In 93.3% of cases (56/60), the consensus score matched with the majority opinion of pathologists' independent scores. Seven (41.2%) of the 17 cases reported locally as HER2 0 were classified as HER2 low. Conversely, among 32 cases with local scores of 1+, 7 (21.8%) were reclassified as ultralow or null. Individual pathologists' accuracy in matching the consensus scores ranged from 73.3% to 91.67% (mean, 80.74%). Among HER2-low cancers those in which <20% of the tumor cells expressed HER2 had the lowest concordance levels. Observers Cohen's κ coefficients for concordance were excellent for 4, good in 1, and moderate in the 4 observers. This reference set of cases with expert consensus HER2 scores will be invaluable for peer training and development of our national external quality assurance program for HER2-low cancers. For assessing breast cancers at the low end of HER2 protein expression, our targeted scoring criteria and explicit instruction on pitfalls improved pathologists' accuracy and concordance.
DESTINY Breast-04 试验显示,对于转移性 HER2 低水平乳腺癌(免疫组化 1+或 2+,无扩增)患者,曲妥珠单抗 deruxtecan 具有生存优势。尽管该试验采用了 2018 年美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)/美国病理学家协会(CAP)HER2 免疫组化评分标准,但免疫组化评分的主观性和不准确性引起了人们的关注,即患者的治疗可能会出现偏差。我们的 9 名经验丰富的乳腺病理学家整理了来自 3 个实验室的 60 例乳腺癌核心活检的匿名数据集,使用 Ventana 4B5 HER2 检测进行评估,并且大多数本地评分均为 HER2 0 或 1+。根据 ASCO/CAP 2018 标准和我们在报告 HER2 免疫组化方面的丰富经验,我们为低水平 HER2 蛋白表达的癌症指定了评分约定,并详细说明了具体的评分陷阱。然后,每位病理学家都对免疫组化切片的数字全切片图像进行了回顾,并对每个病例的 HER2 表达进行了评分。在随后的共识研讨会上,我们共同审查了这些病例,为每个病例确定了共识评分,并确定了表达 HER2 的肿瘤细胞的百分比。所有病例均达成共识,其中 40 例被归类为 1+,3 例为 2+(无扩增),总计 43 例(71.7%)为 HER2 低水平癌症。其余病例为 HER2 0。在 93.3%的病例(56/60)中,共识评分与病理学家独立评分的多数意见一致。在 17 例当地报告为 HER2 0 的病例中,有 7 例(41.2%)被归类为 HER2 低水平。相反,在 32 例局部评分 1+的病例中,有 7 例(21.8%)被重新归类为超低或零。个别病理学家在匹配共识评分方面的准确性从 73.3%到 91.67%(平均值为 80.74%)不等。在 HER2 低水平癌症中,表达 HER2 的肿瘤细胞<20%的病例一致性水平最低。HER2 低水平癌症观察者 Cohen's κ 系数一致性极好的有 4 个,好的有 1 个,中等的有 4 个。这个具有专家共识 HER2 评分的参考病例集对于同行培训和我们的国家 HER2 低水平癌症外部质量保证计划的发展将非常宝贵。对于评估 HER2 蛋白表达水平较低的乳腺癌,我们的靶向评分标准和对陷阱的明确说明提高了病理学家的准确性和一致性。