Suppr超能文献

用于测量神经病理性疼痛临床前模型中未引出疼痛的策略:系统评价。

Strategies for measuring non-evoked pain in preclinical models of neuropathic pain: Systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada 18016, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience, Biomedical Research Center, University of Granada, 18100 Armilla, Granada, Spain; Biosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, Granada 18012, Spain.

Health Sciences School, Centro Universitario Internacional de Madrid (CUNIMAD), Madrid, Spain; Health Sciences School, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Logroño, Spain.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Aug;163:105761. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105761. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

Abstract

The development of new analgesics for neuropathic pain treatment is crucial. The failure of promising drugs in clinical trials may be related to the over-reliance on reflex-based responses (evoked pain) in preclinical drug testing, which may not fully represent clinical neuropathic pain, characterized by spontaneous non-evoked pain (NEP). Hence, strategies for assessing NEP in preclinical studies emerged. This systematic review identified 443 articles evaluating NEP in neuropathic pain models (mainly traumatic nerve injuries in male rodents). An exponential growth in NEP evaluation was observed, which was assessed using 48 different tests classified in 12 NEP-related outcomes: anxiety, exploration/locomotion, paw lifting, depression, conditioned place preference, gait, autotomy, wellbeing, facial grooming, cognitive impairment, facial pain expressions and vocalizations. Although most of these outcomes showed clear limitations, our analysis suggests that conditioning-associated outcomes, pain-related comorbidities, and gait evaluation may be the most effective strategies. Moreover, a minimal part of the studies evaluated standard analgesics. The greater emphasis on evaluating NEP aligning with clinical pain symptoms may enhance analgesic drug development, improving clinical translation.

摘要

开发治疗神经性疼痛的新型镇痛药至关重要。有前景的药物在临床试验中的失败可能与临床前药物测试中过度依赖基于反射的反应(诱发疼痛)有关,这可能无法完全代表以自发性非诱发疼痛(NEP)为特征的临床神经性疼痛。因此,出现了用于评估临床前研究中 NEP 的策略。这项系统评价确定了 443 篇评估神经性疼痛模型中 NEP 的文章(主要是雄性啮齿动物的创伤性神经损伤)。观察到 NEP 评估呈指数增长,使用 48 种不同的测试进行评估,这些测试分为 12 个与 NEP 相关的结果进行分类:焦虑、探索/运动、提起爪子、抑郁、条件性位置偏好、步态、自截、幸福感、面部梳理、认知障碍、面部疼痛表情和发声。尽管这些结果大多存在明显的局限性,但我们的分析表明,与条件相关的结果、与疼痛相关的合并症以及步态评估可能是最有效的策略。此外,只有一小部分研究评估了标准镇痛药。更加强调与临床疼痛症状相符的 NEP 评估可能会促进镇痛药的开发,从而提高临床转化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验