Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick Saint John, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 11;19(6):e0305088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305088. eCollection 2024.
Although cannabis was legalized in Canada in 2018 and is one of the most used substances in Canada, few studies have examined how individuals with different patterns of cannabis use differ in their attempts to decrease or abstain from cannabis. The current study examined how groups of cannabis users, which were formed on the basis of demographic characteristics, substance use patterns, mental health symptoms, and self-reported quality of life differed on their experiences with cannabis cessation. A sample of 147 Canadian adult participants who had attempted to decrease or quit cannabis were recruited from the community (n = 84, 57.14%) and crowdsourcing (n = 63, 42.86%). Four profiles of cannabis users emerged using a Latent Profile Analysis: low-risk (n = 62, 42.18%), rapidly escalating high-risk (n = 40, 27.21%), long-term high severity (n = 35, 23.81%), and long-term lower severity (n = 10, 6.80%). Individuals in the rapidly escalating profile had attempted to decrease their cannabis use more times compared to other profiles. More participants in the long-term high severity group found their use stayed the same or got worse after their last cessation attempt, compared to the low-risk group where more individuals indicated their use stopped. The results of the current study indicate that cannabis users differ in their attempts at reducing or ceasing cannabis use and that they may benefit from different intensity of cannabis interventions.
尽管 2018 年加拿大已将大麻合法化,并且大麻是加拿大使用最广泛的物质之一,但很少有研究调查过不同大麻使用模式的个体在试图减少或戒除大麻方面有何不同。本研究考察了基于人口统计学特征、物质使用模式、心理健康症状和自我报告的生活质量的大麻使用者群体,在他们的大麻戒除经验上有何不同。从社区(n = 84,57.14%)和众包(n = 63,42.86%)中招募了 147 名试图减少或停止使用大麻的加拿大成年参与者,采用潜在剖面分析方法得出了四种大麻使用者特征:低风险(n = 62,42.18%)、快速升级的高风险(n = 40,27.21%)、长期高严重程度(n = 35,23.81%)和长期低严重程度(n = 10,6.80%)。与其他特征相比,快速升级特征的个体尝试减少大麻使用的次数更多。与低风险组相比,更多来自长期高严重程度组的参与者发现他们的使用情况在最后一次戒断尝试后保持不变或变得更糟,而低风险组中更多的人表示他们的使用已停止。本研究的结果表明,大麻使用者在减少或停止使用大麻方面存在差异,他们可能受益于不同强度的大麻干预。