Kumar Jayant, Reccia Isabella, Carneiro Adriano, Podda Mauro, Virdis Francesco, Machairas Nikolaos, Nasralla David, Arasaradnam Ramesh P, Poon Kenneth, Gannon Christopher J, Fung John J, Habib Nagy, Llaguna Omar
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae066.
Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with an increased incidence of surgical-site infections, often leading to a significant rise in morbidity and mortality. This trend underlines the inadequacy of traditional antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. Hence, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of antimicrobial prophylaxis, comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with traditional antibiotics.
Upon registering in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023479100), a systematic search of various databases was conducted over the interval 2000-2023. This inclusive search encompassed a wide range of study types, including prospective and retrospective cohorts and RCTs. The subsequent data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan 5.4.
A total of eight studies involving 2382 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and received either piperacillin/tazobactam (1196 patients) or traditional antibiotics (1186 patients) as antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group had significantly reduced incidences of surgical-site infections (OR 0.43 (95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.62); P < 0.00001) and major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III) (OR 0.61 (95% c.i. 0.45 to 0.81); P = 0.0008). Subgroup analysis of surgical-site infections highlighted significantly reduced incidences of superficial surgical-site infections (OR 0.34 (95% c.i. 0.14 to 0.84); P = 0.02) and organ/space surgical-site infections (OR 0.47 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.78); P = 0.004) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. Further, the analysis demonstrated significantly lower incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C) (OR 0.67 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 0.83); P = 0.0003) and mortality (OR 0.51 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.91); P = 0.02) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group.
Piperacillin/tazobactam as antimicrobial prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of postoperative surgical-site infections, major surgical complications (complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C), and mortality, hence supporting the implementation of piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis in current practice.
胰十二指肠切除术与手术部位感染发生率增加相关,这常常导致发病率和死亡率显著上升。这一趋势凸显了传统抗生素预防策略的不足。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是评估抗菌药物预防的效果,比较哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与传统抗生素。
在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库PROSPERO(CRD42023479100)注册后,于2000年至2023年期间对各种数据库进行了系统检索。这种全面的检索涵盖了广泛的研究类型,包括前瞻性和回顾性队列研究以及随机对照试验。随后使用RevMan 5.4进行数据分析。
共有八项研究纳入了荟萃分析,这些研究涉及2382例行胰十二指肠切除术的患者,他们在手术期间接受了哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(1196例患者)或传统抗生素(1186例患者)作为抗生素预防。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组患者的手术部位感染发生率显著降低(比值比0.43(95%置信区间0.30至0.62);P<0.00001),主要手术并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级大于或等于III级)发生率也显著降低(比值比0.61(95%置信区间0.45至0.81);P = 0.0008)。手术部位感染的亚组分析显示,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组浅表手术部位感染发生率显著降低(比值比0.34(95%置信区间0.14至0.84);P = 0.02),器官/腔隙手术部位感染发生率也显著降低(比值比0.47(95%置信区间0.28至0.78);P = 0.004)。此外,分析表明哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组临床相关术后胰瘘(B级和C级)发生率显著更低(比值比0.67(95%置信区间0.53至0.83);P = 0.0003),死亡率也显著更低(比值比0.51(95%置信区间0.28至0.91);P = 0.02)。
哌拉西林/他唑巴坦作为抗菌药物预防可显著降低术后手术部位感染、主要手术并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级大于或等于III级的并发症)、临床相关术后胰瘘(B级和C级)以及死亡率的风险,因此支持在当前实践中使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦进行手术预防。