Suppr超能文献

跨文化肉类消费中自相矛盾的性别效应。

Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures.

作者信息

Hopwood Christopher J, Zizer Jahn N, Nissen Adam T, Dillard Courtney, Thompkins Andie M, Graça Joāo, Waldhorn Daniela Romero, Bleidorn Wiebke

机构信息

University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62511-3.

Abstract

Men tend to eat more meat than women, but it is not clear why. We tested three hypotheses in a cross-cultural design (20,802 individuals in 23 countries across four continents): that gender differences are (a) universal, (b) related to gender roles and thus weaker in countries with higher gender equality and human development, or (c) related to opportunities to express gender roles and thus stronger in countries with higher gender equality and human development. Across all countries, men tended to consume more meat than women. However, this difference increased significantly in countries with greater human development and gender equality. The paradoxical gender gap in meat consumption aligns with previous research that suggests greater differences in behavior across genders in contexts that are more developed and gender equal. We discuss implications for theories of culture and gender as well as practical implications for global meat reduction.

摘要

男性往往比女性吃更多的肉,但原因尚不清楚。我们在一项跨文化设计中检验了三个假设(来自四大洲23个国家的20802人):性别差异(a)具有普遍性,(b)与性别角色相关,因此在性别平等程度较高和人类发展水平较高的国家中较弱,或者(c)与表达性别角色的机会相关,因此在性别平等程度较高和人类发展水平较高的国家中较强。在所有国家中,男性往往比女性消费更多的肉。然而,在人类发展水平和性别平等程度较高的国家,这种差异显著增加。肉类消费中这种矛盾的性别差距与之前的研究一致,该研究表明,在更发达和性别平等的环境中,不同性别之间的行为差异更大。我们讨论了这对文化和性别理论的影响以及对全球减少肉类消费的实际影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af77/11176159/5676af3906a7/41598_2024_62511_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验