The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14109. doi: 10.1111/hex.14109.
The ability to self-advocate or have a say in one's care is integral to personalised care after acquired brain injury (ABI). This study aimed to understand what constitutes self-advocacy and associated barriers and facilitators throughout hospital transitions and into the community.
Qualitative methodology was employed with semistructured interviews conducted with 12 people with ABI and 13 family members. Interviews were conducted at predischarge (in-person or via telephone) and 4 months postdischarge (via telephone) from the brain injury rehabilitation unit of a tertiary hospital. Data were thematically analysed using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach.
Self-advocacy reflects the process of reclaiming agency or people's efforts to exert influence over care decisions after ABI. Agency varies along a continuum, often beginning with impaired processing of the self or environment (loss of agency) before individuals start to understand and question their care (emerging agency) and ultimately plan and direct their ongoing and future care (striving for agency). This process may vary across individuals and contexts. Barriers to self-advocacy for individuals with ABI include neurocognitive deficits that limit capacity and desire for control over decisions, unfamiliar and highly structured environments and lack of family support. Facilitators include neurocognitive recovery, growing desire to self-advocate and scaffolded support from family and clinicians.
Self-advocacy after ABI entails a process of reclaiming agency whereby individuals seek to understand, question and direct their ongoing care. This is facilitated by neurocognitive recovery, growing capacity and desire and scaffolded supports. Research evaluating approaches for embedding self-advocacy skills early in brain injury rehabilitation is recommended.
Two caregivers with lived experience of supporting a family member with ABI were involved in the design and conduct of this study and contributed to and provided feedback on the manuscript.
在获得性脑损伤(ABI)后,能够自我倡导或对自己的护理发表意见是个性化护理的重要组成部分。本研究旨在了解在医院过渡期间和进入社区后,自我倡导的构成以及相关的障碍和促进因素。
采用定性方法,对 12 名 ABI 患者和 13 名家庭成员进行半结构化访谈。访谈在从三级医院的脑损伤康复病房出院前(面对面或通过电话)和出院后 4 个月(通过电话)进行。使用混合演绎归纳方法对数据进行主题分析。
自我倡导反映了在 ABI 后重新获得代理权或人们努力对护理决策施加影响的过程。代理权沿着一个连续体变化,通常从自我或环境的加工受损(失去代理权)开始,然后个体开始理解和质疑他们的护理(出现代理权),最终计划和指导他们的持续和未来护理(努力争取代理权)。这个过程可能因人而异,因环境而异。ABI 患者自我倡导的障碍包括限制对决策的控制能力和意愿的神经认知缺陷、不熟悉和高度结构化的环境以及缺乏家庭支持。促进因素包括神经认知恢复、自我倡导的愿望增强以及来自家庭和临床医生的有针对性的支持。
ABI 后的自我倡导需要一个重新获得代理权的过程,个体通过这个过程寻求理解、质疑和指导他们的持续护理。这得益于神经认知恢复、不断增强的能力和愿望以及有针对性的支持。建议开展研究评估在脑损伤康复早期嵌入自我倡导技能的方法。
两名有照顾 ABI 家庭成员经验的护理人员参与了本研究的设计和实施,并对手稿进行了贡献和反馈。