College of Basic Medical and Sciences Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China.
Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA.
Mediators Inflamm. 2024 May 27;2024:7709277. doi: 10.1155/2024/7709277. eCollection 2024.
At present, Alzheimer's disease (AD) lacks effective treatment means, and early diagnosis and intervention are the keys to treatment. Therefore, for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients, blood sample analysis using the 4D nonstandard (label-free) proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis, looking for specific protein marker expression differences, is important. These marker levels change as AD progresses, and the analysis of these biomarkers changes with this method, which has the potential to show the degree of disease progression and can be used for the diagnosis and preventive treatment of MCI and AD.
Patients were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into three groups according to scale scores. Elderly patients diagnosed with AD were selected as the AD group ( = 9). Patients diagnosed with MCI were classified into the MCI group ( = 10). Cognitively healthy elderly patients were included in the normal cognition control group ( = 10). Patients' blood samples were used for 4D label-free proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis to identify potential blood biomarkers. The sample size of each group was expanded ( = 30), and the selected biomarkers were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to verify the accuracy of the proteomic prediction.
Six specific blood markers, namely, APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8, were detected by 4D label-free proteomic quantitative analysis. These markers showed a statistically significant upregulation trend in the MCI and AD groups compared with the normal cognition control group ( < 0.05). ELISA results showed that the levels of these six proteins in the MCI group were significantly higher than those in the normal cognition control group, and the levels of these six proteins in the AD group were significantly higher than those in the MCI group ( < 0.05).
The plasma levels of APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8 in cognitively healthy elderly patients and patients with MCI and AD were significantly different and, more importantly, showed a trend of increasing expression. These results indicate that these six human plasma markers have important diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the identification of cognitive impairment and have value for in-depth research and clinical application.
目前,阿尔茨海默病(AD)缺乏有效的治疗手段,早期诊断和干预是治疗的关键。因此,对于轻度认知障碍(MCI)和 AD 患者,使用 4D 非标准(无标记)蛋白质组深度定量分析的血液样本分析,寻找特定蛋白质标志物表达的差异非常重要。这些标志物水平随着 AD 的进展而变化,使用这种方法分析这些生物标志物的变化,有可能显示疾病进展程度,并可用于 MCI 和 AD 的诊断和预防性治疗。
根据纳入和排除标准招募患者,并根据量表评分将其分为三组。选择被诊断为 AD 的老年患者为 AD 组(n=9)。将被诊断为 MCI 的患者分为 MCI 组(n=10)。将认知健康的老年患者纳入正常认知对照组(n=10)。使用患者的血液样本进行 4D 无标记蛋白质组深度定量分析,以鉴定潜在的血液生物标志物。每组的样本量扩大(n=30),并通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)验证所选生物标志物,以验证蛋白质组预测的准确性。
通过 4D 无标记蛋白质组定量分析检测到 6 种特定的血液标志物,即 APOE、MMP9、UBR5、PLA2G7、STAT5B 和 S100A8。与正常认知对照组相比,MCI 和 AD 组这些标志物的表达呈显著上调趋势(<0.05)。ELISA 结果显示,MCI 组中这 6 种蛋白质的水平明显高于正常认知对照组,AD 组中这 6 种蛋白质的水平明显高于 MCI 组(<0.05)。
认知健康的老年患者和 MCI 及 AD 患者的 APOE、MMP9、UBR5、PLA2G7、STAT5B 和 S100A8 血浆水平存在显著差异,更重要的是,表达呈上升趋势。这些结果表明,这 6 个人血浆标志物在识别认知障碍方面具有重要的诊断和治疗潜力,具有深入研究和临床应用的价值。