Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 18;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03474-0.
Previous studies have shown that the addition of platinum to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improved outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, no studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of taxane and lobaplatin. In this study, we conducted a randomized controlled phase II clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline.
We randomly allocated patients with stage I-III TNBC into Arm A and Arm B. Arm A received six cycles of taxane combined with lobaplatin (TL). Arm B received six cycles of taxane combined with anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (TEC) or eight cycles of anthracycline combined with cyclophosphamide and sequential use of taxane (EC-T). Both Arms underwent surgery after NAC. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
A total of 103 patients (51 in Arm A and 52 in Arm B) were assessed. The pCR rate of Arm A was significantly higher than that of Arm B (41.2% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.028). Patients with positive lymph nodes and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) benefited significantly more from Arm A than those with negative lymph nodes and high NLR (P = 0.001, P = 0.012, respectively). There was no significant difference in EFS (P = 0.895) or OS (P = 0.633) between the two arms. The prevalence of grade-3/4 anemia was higher in Arm A (P = 0.015), and the prevalence of grade-3/4 neutropenia was higher in Arm B (P = 0.044).
Neoadjuvant taxane plus lobaplatin has shown better efficacy than taxane plus anthracycline, and both regimens have similar toxicity profiles. This trial may provide a reference for a better combination strategy of immunotherapy in NAC for TNBC in the future.
先前的研究表明,在新辅助化疗(NAC)中加入铂类药物可改善三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的预后。然而,尚无研究评估紫杉醇联合洛铂的疗效和安全性。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项随机对照的 II 期临床研究,比较了紫杉醇联合洛铂或蒽环类药物的疗效和安全性。
我们将 I-III 期 TNBC 患者随机分配到 A 组和 B 组。A 组接受 6 个周期的紫杉醇联合洛铂(TL)治疗。B 组接受 6 个周期的紫杉醇联合蒽环类药物和环磷酰胺(TEC)或 8 个周期的蒽环类药物联合环磷酰胺序贯使用紫杉醇(EC-T)治疗。两组患者在 NAC 后均接受手术治疗。主要终点为病理完全缓解(pCR)。次要终点为无事件生存(EFS)、总生存(OS)和安全性。
共纳入 103 例患者(A 组 51 例,B 组 52 例)。A 组的 pCR 率明显高于 B 组(41.2%比 21.2%,P=0.028)。淋巴结阳性和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)低的患者从 A 组获益明显多于淋巴结阴性和 NLR 高的患者(P=0.001,P=0.012)。两组间 EFS(P=0.895)或 OS(P=0.633)无显著差异。A 组贫血 3/4 级发生率较高(P=0.015),B 组中性粒细胞减少症 3/4 级发生率较高(P=0.044)。
新辅助紫杉醇联合洛铂的疗效优于紫杉醇联合蒽环类药物,且两种方案的毒性谱相似。本试验可能为未来 TNBC 的 NAC 中免疫治疗的更好联合策略提供参考。