Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States.
Microsurgery. 2024 Jul;44(5):e31203. doi: 10.1002/micr.31203.
The scapular free flap (SFF) is essential in complex reconstructive surgery and often indicated in complex defects with compromised or poor local tissue integrity. This review aims to assess the versatility and reliability of the SFF during reconstruction.
A comprehensive literature review of multiple databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An analysis of pooled data was performed to evaluate flap failure rate for any anatomical unit using SFF as the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included other complication rates after reconstruction such as partial flap loss, revision surgery, fistula, hematoma, and infection.
A total of 110 articles were included, with 1447 pooled flaps. The main recipient site was the head and neck region (89.0%). Major indications for reconstruction were malignancy (55.3%), burns (19.2%), and trauma (9.3%). The most common types of flaps were osteocutaneous (23.3%), cutaneous (22.6%), and chimeric (18.0%). The pooled flap failure rate was 2% (95%CI: 1%-4%). No significant heterogeneity was present across studies (Q statistic 20.2, p = .69; I .00%, p = .685). Nonscapular supplementary flaps and grafts were required in 61 cases. The average length and surface area of bone flaps were 7.2 cm and 24.8cm, respectively. The average skin paddle area was 134.2cm.
The SFF is a useful adjunct in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium as evidence by its intrinsic versatility and diverse clinical indications. Our data suggest a low failure rate in multicomponent defect reconstruction, especially in head and neck surgery. SFFs enable incorporation of multiple tissue types and customizable dimensions-both for vascularized bone and cutaneous skin-augmenting its value in the microsurgeon's repertoire as a chimeric flap. Further research is necessary to overcome the conventional barriers to SFF utilization and to better comprehend the specific scenarios in which the SFF can serve as the preferred alternative workhorse flap.
肩胛骨游离皮瓣(SFF)在复杂重建手术中至关重要,常用于伴有局部组织完整性受损或不良的复杂缺损。本综述旨在评估 SFF 在重建中的多功能性和可靠性。
根据 PRISMA 指南对多个数据库进行了全面的文献综述。对使用 SFF 作为主要终点的任何解剖单位的皮瓣失败率进行了汇总数据分析。次要终点包括重建后其他并发症的发生率,如部分皮瓣坏死、修复手术、瘘管、血肿和感染。
共纳入 110 篇文章,共有 1447 个汇总皮瓣。主要受区部位为头颈部(89.0%)。重建的主要适应证为恶性肿瘤(55.3%)、烧伤(19.2%)和创伤(9.3%)。最常见的皮瓣类型为骨-皮瓣(23.3%)、皮瓣(22.6%)和嵌合皮瓣(18.0%)。汇总的皮瓣失败率为 2%(95%CI:1%-4%)。各研究之间无显著异质性(Q 统计量 20.2,p =.69;I 2 = 0.0%,p =.685)。61 例需要使用非肩胛骨补充皮瓣和移植物。骨瓣的平均长度和表面积分别为 7.2cm 和 24.8cm,皮瓣的平均面积为 134.2cm 2 。
SFF 是重建外科医生手术工具中的有用辅助工具,这一点可从其内在的多功能性和广泛的临床适应证得到证明。我们的数据表明,在多部位缺损重建中,失败率较低,尤其是在头颈部手术中。SFF 能够整合多种组织类型和可定制的尺寸,包括带血管的骨和皮肤,从而增加了其在显微外科医生手中作为嵌合皮瓣的价值。需要进一步的研究来克服 SFF 应用的传统障碍,并更好地理解 SFF 可以作为首选替代主力皮瓣的具体情况。