Suppr超能文献

候选心理过程的10周轨迹对在线二元干预与正念干预带来的心理健康改善有不同预测作用:一项随机临床试验

10-Week Trajectories of Candidate Psychological Processes Differentially Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Dyadic versus Mindfulness Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Godara Malvika, Singer Tania

机构信息

Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, 10557 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):3295. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113295.

Abstract

: App-based contemplative interventions, such as mindfulness-based interventions, have gained popularity for the promotion of mental health; however, the understanding of underlying intervention-specific mechanisms remains limited, especially related to novel inter-relational dyadic practices. : We tested (n = 253) seven putative mechanisms underlying two brief (daily 12-min) online mental interventions: attention-focused mindfulness and socio-emotional partner-based, both supported by weekly online coaching. Weekly self-reports of rumination, worry, psychological flexibility, affective control, social support, acceptance, and mindfulness were obtained over 10 weeks of intervention, and depression, anxiety, and resilience were assessed as pre- and post-intervention outcomes. : Significant week-to-week reductions in rumination and increases in psychological flexibility were observed in both interventions. Only attention-based practice led to temporal reductions in worry, and only socio-emotional dyadic practice led to temporal increases in affective control. Mediation analyses with slopes of weekly variables as mediators detected no significant indirect effects. However, exploratory moderation analyses revealed that intervention-related reductions in depressive symptomatology and anxiety vulnerability and increases in resilience were predicted by weekly increases in acceptance and affective control in the socio-emotional dyadic group, and by weekly reductions in rumination and worry in the mindfulness group. Limitations of the study include reliance on brief self-report measures, relatively small sample size, and absence of long-term follow-up assessments indicating the need for future well-powered longitudinal studies comparing intervention modalities. : We present preliminary evidence for practice-specific active ingredients of contemplative interventions, which can be leveraged to enhance their efficiency for mental health.

摘要

基于应用程序的冥想干预措施,如基于正念的干预措施,在促进心理健康方面越来越受欢迎;然而,对其潜在的特定干预机制的理解仍然有限,尤其是与新型的二元关系实践相关的机制。我们测试了(n = 253)两种简短的(每天12分钟)在线心理干预措施背后的七种假定机制:专注注意力的正念和基于社会情感伙伴的干预措施,两者都有每周一次的在线辅导支持。在为期10周的干预过程中,每周获取关于反刍、担忧、心理灵活性、情感控制、社会支持、接纳和正念的自我报告,并在干预前后评估抑郁、焦虑和恢复力。在两种干预措施中均观察到反刍每周显著减少,心理灵活性增加。只有基于注意力的练习导致担忧暂时减少,只有基于社会情感二元关系的练习导致情感控制暂时增加。以每周变量的斜率作为中介的中介分析未发现显著的间接效应。然而,探索性调节分析显示,社会情感二元关系组中接纳和情感控制的每周增加,以及正念组中反刍和担忧的每周减少,预测了与干预相关的抑郁症状和焦虑易感性的降低以及恢复力的增加。该研究的局限性包括依赖简短的自我报告测量、样本量相对较小,以及缺乏长期随访评估,这表明未来需要进行有足够效力的纵向研究来比较不同的干预方式。我们提供了冥想干预措施特定实践有效成分的初步证据,可利用这些证据提高其对心理健康的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65a9/11172466/23204bc09eba/jcm-13-03295-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验