From the Department of Neuroradiology (D.P., F.C., P.C., J.S., A.L.), A. Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France
From the Department of Neuroradiology (D.P., F.C., P.C., J.S., A.L.), A. Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Jul 8;45(7):965-970. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8233.
MR imaging is the technique of choice for patients presenting with acute loss of visual acuity with no obvious ophthalmologic cause. The goal of our study was to compare orbits contrast-enhanced 2D coronal T1WI with a whole-brain contrast-enhanced 3D (WBCE-3D) TSE T1WI at 3T for the detection of optic nerve enhancement.
This institutional review board-approved retrospective single-center study included patients presenting with acute loss of vision who underwent 3T MR imaging from November 2014 to February 2020. Two radiologists, blinded to all data, individually assessed the presence of enhancement of the optic nerve on orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI and WBCE-3D T1WI separately and in random order. A McNemar test and a Cohen κ method were used for comparing the 2 MR imaging sequences.
One thousand twenty-three patients (638 women and 385 men; mean age, 42 [SD, 18.3] years) were included. There was a strong concordance between WBCE-3D T1WI and orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI when detecting enhancement of the optic nerve: κ = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). WBCE-3D T1WI was significantly more likely to detect canalicular enhancement compared with orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI: 178/1023 (17.4%) versus 138/1023 (13.5%) (< .001) and 108/1023 (10.6%) versus 90/1023 (8.8%) (= .04), respectively. The WBCE-3D T1WI sequence detected 27/1023 (3%) instances of optic disc enhancement versus 0/1023 (0%) on orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI. There were significantly fewer severe artifacts on WBCE-3D T1WI compared with orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI: 68/1023 (6.6%) versus 101/1023 (9.8%) (< .001). The median reader-reported confidence was significantly higher with coronal T1WI compared with 3D TSE T1WI: 5 (95% CI, 4-5) versus 3 (95% CI, 1-4; < .001).
Our study showed that there was a strong concordance between WBCE-3D T1WI and orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI when detecting enhancement of the optic nerve in patients with acute loss of visual acuity with no obvious ophthalmologic cause. WBCE-3D T1WI demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing optic neuritis, particularly in cases involving the canalicular segments.
对于因不明眼部原因而导致急性视力丧失的患者,磁共振成像(MRI)是首选的检查技术。本研究的目的是比较对比增强二维冠状 T1WI 和全脑对比增强三维(WBCE-3D)TSE T1WI 在 3T 场强下对视神经增强的检测效果。
这项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性单中心研究纳入了 2014 年 11 月至 2020 年 2 月期间因急性视力丧失而接受 3T MRI 检查的患者。两位放射科医生在不知所有数据的情况下,分别对眼眶对比增强二维 T1WI 和 WBCE-3D T1WI 上视神经增强的存在情况进行评估,并以随机顺序分别进行评估。采用 McNemar 检验和 Cohen κ 法比较两种 MRI 序列。
共纳入 1023 例患者(638 名女性和 385 名男性;平均年龄为 42 岁[标准差,18.3 岁])。当检测因不明眼部原因而导致的急性视力丧失患者的视神经增强时,WBCE-3D T1WI 与眼眶对比增强二维 T1WI 之间具有很强的一致性:κ=0.87(95%置信区间,0.84-0.90)。与眼眶对比增强二维 T1WI 相比,WBCE-3D T1WI 更有可能检测到管内段增强:178/1023(17.4%)比 138/1023(13.5%)(<.001)和 108/1023(10.6%)比 90/1023(8.8%)(=.04)。WBCE-3D T1WI 序列检测到 27/1023(3%)例视盘增强,而眼眶对比增强二维 T1WI 检测到 0/1023(0%)例。与眼眶对比增强二维 T1WI 相比,WBCE-3D T1WI 上的严重伪影明显更少:68/1023(6.6%)比 101/1023(9.8%)(<.001)。与 3D TSE T1WI 相比,冠状 T1WI 的读者报告置信度中位数明显更高:5(95%置信区间,4-5)比 3(95%置信区间,1-4)(<.001)。
本研究表明,在因不明眼部原因而导致急性视力丧失的患者中,当检测视神经增强时,WBCE-3D T1WI 与眼眶对比增强二维 T1WI 之间具有很强的一致性。WBCE-3D T1WI 在诊断视神经炎方面具有更高的敏感性和特异性,特别是在涉及管内段的病例中。