Comprehensive Systematic Review of Poly-L-lactic Acid in Facial Clinical Application.

OBJECTIVES

With the increasing global clinical application of regenerative injection materials, there is a growing recognition of the crucial role played by poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA). The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PLLA in clinical applications for facial treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases, followed by screening of the retrieved articles based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then performed an analysis on the final set of included articles that met our inclusion criteria. Within these included articles, quality assessment for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was carried out using the Jadad scale, while non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) were evaluated using the MINORS scale.

RESULTS

Our search of above database, using the relevant search terms, yielded a total of 1300 PLLA-related articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1280 articles were excluded. Only 20 articles, 16 in English and 4 in Chinese, were included in our final analysis, among them 16 NRCTs and 4 RCTs. According to the different clinical evaluation standards, the treatment of PLLA has achieved good outcomes. Most PLLA injection-related adverse events are mild and self-limited, without any additional treatment requirement.

CONCLUSION

PLLA is a reasonably safe and effective facial injection material that can be applied in different facial injection areas and depth using various reconstitute and injection methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .