Safety and Efficacy of Newer Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Single-Center Ambispective Study from South India.

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT) poses a rare but life-threatening challenge, warranting meticulous treatment approaches. Traditional therapy involves Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs), but Newer Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) offer potential advantages. This study addresses a crucial knowledge gap in the Indian context, analyzing real-world data to guide CVT management decisions.

METHODS

A single-center, ambispective cohort study included consecutive adult CVT patients. Data collection encompassed demographics, clinical data, imaging, and treatment details. Patients were categorized into VKA and NOAC groups. Outcomes measured recanalization status, functional outcomes, bleeding events, and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Among 181 enrolled patients, NOAC-treated (Group B) individuals had significantly higher rates of complete recanalization (58.5% vs. 31.1%) with a similar incidence of adverse events and also displayed better functional outcomes at weeks 8 and 12 compared to VKA-treated (Group A) patients. Recurrent thromboembolic events were absent in both groups during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights NOACs' potential advantages in CVT management, including improved functional outcomes, enhanced recanalization, and similar bleeding risk. Adverse events were milder with NOACs. While acknowledging limitations, these findings support NOACs as a promising alternative to VKAs, advancing CVT care and outcomes.