Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University and Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration and Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration and Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, China.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Sep;166(3):252-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
This study aimed to analyze the comprehensive maxillofacial features of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry to develop a classification system for diagnosis and surgical planning.
A total of 161 adult patients were included, with 121 patients in the asymmetry group (menton deviation >2 mm) and 40 patients in the symmetry group (menton deviation ≤2 mm). Twenty-eight variables were determined, including transverse translation, roll and yaw of each facial unit, transverse width, mandibular morphology, and transverse dental compensation. Principal component (PC) analysis was conducted to extract PCs, and cluster analysis was performed using these components to classify the asymmetry group. A decision tree was constructed on the basis of the clustering results.
Six PCs were extracted, explaining 80.622% of the data variability. The asymmetry group was classified into 4 subgroups: (1) atypical type (15.7%) showed an opposite roll direction of maxillary dentition than of menton deviation; (2) compound type (34.71%) demonstrated significant ramus height differences, maxillary roll, and mandibular roll and yaw; (3) mandibular yaw type (44.63%) showed slight mandibular yaw without mandibular morphology asymmetry; and (4) maxillary-shift type (4.96%) shared similarities with the compound type but showed significant maxillary translation. The classification and regression tree model achieved a prediction accuracy of up to 85.11%.
This study identified 4 distinct phenotypes using cluster analysis and proposed tailored treatment recommendations on the basis of their specific characteristics. The classification results emphasized the importance of spatial displacement features, especially mandibular yaw, in diagnosing facial asymmetry. The established classification and regression tree model enables clinicians to identify patients conveniently.
本研究旨在分析骨性 III 类错颌伴面部不对称患者的全面颌面部特征,以建立一种用于诊断和手术计划的分类系统。
共纳入 161 名成年患者,其中 121 名患者为不对称组(颏部偏斜>2mm),40 名患者为对称组(颏部偏斜≤2mm)。确定了 28 个变量,包括每个面单位的横向移位、滚动和偏航、横向宽度、下颌形态和横向牙齿补偿。进行主成分(PC)分析以提取 PC,并使用这些成分进行聚类分析以对不对称组进行分类。基于聚类结果构建决策树。
提取了 6 个 PC,解释了 80.622%的数据变异性。不对称组分为 4 个亚组:(1)非典型型(15.7%)表现为上颌牙列的滚动方向与颏部偏斜方向相反;(2)复合型(34.71%)显示出显著的下颌支高度差异、上颌滚动和下颌滚动和偏航;(3)下颌偏斜型(44.63%)表现为轻微的下颌偏斜而无下颌形态不对称;(4)上颌移位型(4.96%)与复合型相似,但表现为显著的上颌移位。分类和回归树模型的预测准确率高达 85.11%。
本研究通过聚类分析确定了 4 种不同的表型,并根据其特定特征提出了针对性的治疗建议。分类结果强调了空间移位特征,尤其是下颌偏斜,对面部不对称诊断的重要性。所建立的分类和回归树模型可方便临床医生识别患者。