Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Vot-ER, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
Young people and historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups are poorly represented in the democratic process. Addressing voting inequities can make policy more responsive to the needs of these communities.
To assess whether leveraging health care settings as venues for voter registration and mobilization is useful, particularly for historically underrepresented populations in elections.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In 2020, nonpartisan nonprofit Vot-ER partnered with health care professionals and institutions to register people to vote. This cross-sectional study analyzed the demographics and voting behavior of people mobilized to register to vote in health care settings, including hospitals, community health centers, and medical schools across the US. The age and racial and ethnic identity data of individuals engaged through Vot-ER were compared to 2 national surveys of US adults, including the 2020 Cooperative Election Study (CES) and the 2020 American National Election Study (ANES).
Health care-based voter registration.
The main outcomes were age composition, racial and ethnic composition, and voting history.
Of the 12 441 voters contacted in health care settings, 41.9% were aged 18 to 29 years, 15.9% were identified as African American, 9.6% as Asian, 12.7% as Hispanic, and 60.4% as White. This distribution was significantly more diverse than the racial and ethnic distribution of the ANES (N = 5447) and CES (N = 39 014) samples, of which 72.5% and 71.19% self-identified as White, respectively. Voter turnout among health care-based contacts increased from 61.0% in 2016 to 79.8% in 2020, a turnout gain (18.8-percentage point gain) that was 7.7 percentage points higher than that of the ANES sample (11.1-percentage point gain). Demographically, the age distribution of voters contacted in health care settings was significantly different from the ANES and CES samples, with approximately double the proportion of young voters aged 18 to 29 years.
This cross-sectional study suggests that health care-based voter mobilization reaches a distinctly younger and more racially and ethnically diverse population relative to those who reported contact from political campaigns. This analysis of the largest health care-based voter mobilization effort points to the unique impact that medical professionals may have on voter registration and turnout in the 2024 US elections. In the long term, health equity initiatives should prioritize expanding voting access to address the upstream determinants of health in historically marginalized communities.
年轻人和历史上被边缘化的种族和族裔群体在民主进程中代表性不足。解决投票不平等问题可以使政策更能满足这些社区的需求。
评估利用医疗保健环境作为选民登记和动员场所是否有用,特别是对于选举中历来代表性不足的人群。
设计、地点和参与者:2020 年,无党派非营利组织 Vot-ER 与医疗保健专业人员和机构合作,为人们登记投票。这项横断面研究分析了在美国各地的医院、社区卫生中心和医学院等医疗保健环境中动员登记投票的人的人口统计学和投票行为。通过 Vot-ER 接触的个人的年龄和种族及族裔身份数据与两项美国成年人全国调查进行了比较,包括 2020 年合作选举研究(CES)和 2020 年美国全国选举研究(ANES)。
基于医疗保健的选民登记。
主要结果是年龄构成、种族和族裔构成以及投票历史。
在医疗保健环境中联系的 12441 名选民中,41.9%年龄在 18 至 29 岁之间,15.9%被认定为非裔美国人,9.6%为亚裔,12.7%为西班牙裔,60.4%为白人。这一分布明显比 ANES(N=5447)和 CES(N=39014)样本的种族和族裔分布更加多样化,其中分别有 72.5%和 71.19%自认为是白人。基于医疗保健联系的选民投票率从 2016 年的 61.0%上升到 2020 年的 79.8%,这一投票率增长(18.8 个百分点的增长)比 ANES 样本高 7.7 个百分点(11.1 个百分点的增长)。从人口统计学上看,在医疗保健环境中联系的选民的年龄分布与 ANES 和 CES 样本明显不同,18 至 29 岁的年轻选民比例几乎翻了一番。
这项横断面研究表明,与报告接触到政治运动的人相比,基于医疗保健的选民动员活动接触到的人群明显更年轻,种族和族裔更加多样化。对最大规模的基于医疗保健的选民动员工作的这一分析表明,医疗专业人员可能对 2024 年美国选举中的选民登记和投票率产生独特影响。从长期来看,医疗公平倡议应优先扩大投票机会,以解决历史上边缘化社区健康的上游决定因素。