Young Maria-Elena De Trinidad, Sudhinaraset May, Tafolla Sharon, Nakphong Michelle, Yan Yueqi, Kietzman Kathryn
Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, 5200 N Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jul;353:117034. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117034. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
There is growing evidence that Asian and Latinx immigrants' health and health care access is shaped by immigrant policies that determine their rights, protections, and access to resources and the extent to which they are targeted by policing or deportation based on citizenship/legal status and other immigration-related social categories. However, there is limited population-based evidence of how immigrants experience the direct consequences of policies, nor of the impact of such consequences on their health. Between 2018 and 2020, we conducted the Research on Immigrant Health and State Policy (RIGHTS) Study, developing a population-based survey of Asian and Latinx immigrants in California (n = 2010) that measured 23 exclusionary experiences under health care and social services, education, labor/employment, and immigration enforcement policies. Applying Ruth Wilson Gilmore's concept of "disproportionate costs," we conducted a latent class analysis (LCA) and regression models of the RIGHTS data to 1) describe patterns of immigrant policy exclusion experienced by Asian and Latinx immigrants and 2) test relationships between patterns of policy exclusion and health care access and health status. LCA analyses identified 6 classes of distinct combinations of policy exclusions. In regression analyses, respondents in the class with cumulative exclusions across all policy sectors had the worst health care access and highest level of psychological distress, but the best self-rated health; while those in the class with employment and enforcement exclusions also had poor health care access. Respondents in the other 3 classes experienced combinations of health and social services exclusions, but these alone were not associated with worse outcomes. Findings show that the consequences of immigrant policies harm health through both cumulative exposure to and intersections of exclusions across policy sectors. Labor/employment and immigration enforcement policies, specifically, likely drive health inequities within immigrant populations. The RIGHTS study highlights the need to measure the cumulative and intersecting "disproportionate costs" of immigrant policy within diverse immigrant populations.
越来越多的证据表明,亚洲和拉丁裔移民的健康状况及医疗保健获取情况受到移民政策的影响,这些政策决定了他们的权利、保护措施、资源获取途径,以及基于公民身份/法律地位和其他与移民相关的社会类别,他们被治安监管或驱逐的程度。然而,基于人群的证据有限,既不清楚移民如何体验政策的直接后果,也不了解这些后果对其健康的影响。2018年至2020年期间,我们开展了移民健康与国家政策(RIGHTS)研究,对加利福尼亚州的亚洲和拉丁裔移民进行了一项基于人群的调查(n = 2010),该调查衡量了医疗保健和社会服务、教育、劳动力/就业以及移民执法政策下的23种排斥经历。应用露丝·威尔逊·吉尔摩的“不成比例成本”概念,我们对RIGHTS数据进行了潜在类别分析(LCA)和回归模型分析,以1)描述亚洲和拉丁裔移民经历的移民政策排斥模式,以及2)检验政策排斥模式与医疗保健获取和健康状况之间的关系。LCA分析确定了6类不同的政策排斥组合。在回归分析中,在所有政策领域都有累积排斥的类别中的受访者,其医疗保健获取情况最差,心理困扰程度最高,但自我评估健康状况最佳;而在就业和执法方面有排斥的类别中的受访者,其医疗保健获取情况也很差。其他3个类别中的受访者经历了健康和社会服务方面的排斥组合,但仅这些排斥本身与更差的结果无关。研究结果表明,移民政策的后果通过跨政策领域的排斥的累积暴露和交叉影响损害健康。具体而言,劳动力/就业和移民执法政策可能导致移民群体内部的健康不平等。RIGHTS研究强调了在不同移民群体中衡量移民政策累积和交叉的“不成比例成本”的必要性。