Bois Tanguy, Lee K Charlotte, L'Official Guillaume, Donal Erwan
Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes, Pontchaillou Hospital, 2 rue Henri le Guillloux, Rennes 35000, France.
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jun 11;8(6):ytae273. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae273. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Previous literature suggests that patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) experience a high burden of ventricular arrhythmias. Despite this evidence, optimal strategies for arrhythmia prevention and treatment remain subject to debate.
We report the case of a patient with hereditary ATTR cardiomyopathy who developed recurrent ventricular tachycardia prior to a decline in his left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Although he ultimately received an intracardiac device (ICD) for secondary prevention of ventricular tachycardia, his clinical course begets the question of whether more aggressive arrhythmia prevention upfront could have prevented his global functional decline.
Given the advent of new disease-modifying therapies for ATTR, it is imperative to reconsider antiarrhythmic strategies in these patients. New decision tools are needed to decide what additional parameters (beyond LVEF ≤ 35%) may warrant ICD placement for primary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients.
既往文献表明,转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样变性(ATTR)患者经历着较高的室性心律失常负担。尽管有此证据,但心律失常预防和治疗的最佳策略仍存在争议。
我们报告1例遗传性ATTR心肌病患者,在其左心室射血分数(LVEF)下降之前出现复发性室性心动过速。尽管他最终接受了心内装置(ICD)用于室性心动过速的二级预防,但其临床病程引发了一个问题,即更早采取更积极的心律失常预防措施是否可以防止其整体功能下降。
鉴于针对ATTR的新型疾病修饰疗法的出现,必须重新考虑这些患者的抗心律失常策略。需要新的决策工具来确定在这些患者中,除了LVEF≤35%之外,还有哪些额外参数可能值得植入ICD以进行室性心律失常的一级预防。