McGill Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jun 24;6(7):e1112. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001112. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
To review recruitment and retention strategies of randomized family-centered interventional studies in adult ICUs.
The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library database from inception to February 2023.
Randomized controlled trials with family-centered interventions in the ICU setting that reported at least one family-centered outcome that were included in our previously published systematic review.
For recruitment: Number of family members approached and enrolled, type of approach, location, time of day approached, whether medical team approached first, compensation offered, and type of consent. For retention: Number of family members enrolled and completed initial follow-up visit, mode of follow-up, location of follow-up visit, data collection method, timing of follow-up visits, number of follow-up visits, and compensation offered. Recruitment (participants approached/enrolled) and retention (participants enrolled/completed initial follow-up) percentage were calculated.
There were 51 studies in the analysis. The mean recruitment percentage was 49.3% ± 24.3%. There were no differences in recruitment percentage by study country, ICU type, recruitment approach, or whether the medical team approached the family member first (all p > 0.05). The mean retention percentage for the initial follow-up visit was 81.6% ± 18.0%. There were no differences in retention percentage by mode of participant contact, data collection type, or follow-up location (all p > 0.05). Minimal data were available to determine the impact of time of day approached and compensation on recruitment and retention outcomes.
About half of family members of ICU patients approached participated in trials and more than eight in ten completed the initial follow-up visit. We did not identify specific factors that impacted family recruitment or retention. There is a strong need for further studies to characterize optimal strategies to ensure family participation in clinical trials.
综述成人 ICU 中随机家庭为中心的干预性研究的招募和保留策略。
从建库到 2023 年 2 月,检索 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。
在 ICU 环境中进行家庭为中心干预的随机对照试验,报告至少一个家庭为中心的结局,并被纳入我们之前发表的系统综述。
招募:接触并纳入的家庭成员数量、接触方式、地点、接触时间、医疗团队是否首先接触、提供的补偿以及同意类型。保留:纳入并完成初始随访的家庭成员数量、随访方式、随访地点、随访数据收集方法、随访时间、随访次数和提供的补偿。计算招募(接触/纳入的参与者)和保留(纳入/完成初始随访的参与者)百分比。
分析中共有 51 项研究。招募百分比的平均值为 49.3%±24.3%。研究国家、ICU 类型、招募方式或医疗团队是否首先接触家庭成员对招募百分比均无差异(均 P>0.05)。初始随访的保留百分比平均值为 81.6%±18.0%。参与者联系方式、数据收集类型或随访地点对保留百分比均无差异(均 P>0.05)。可用数据很少,无法确定接触时间和补偿对招募和保留结果的影响。
约一半的 ICU 患者家属参与了试验,超过十分之八的人完成了初始随访。我们没有发现影响家庭招募或保留的特定因素。需要进一步研究以确定确保家庭参与临床试验的最佳策略。