Suppr超能文献

招募和保留策略用于涉及 ICU 患者家属的随机临床试验。

Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Randomized Clinical Trials Involving Family Members of ICU Patients.

机构信息

McGill Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jun 24;6(7):e1112. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001112. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review recruitment and retention strategies of randomized family-centered interventional studies in adult ICUs.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library database from inception to February 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials with family-centered interventions in the ICU setting that reported at least one family-centered outcome that were included in our previously published systematic review.

DATA EXTRACTION

For recruitment: Number of family members approached and enrolled, type of approach, location, time of day approached, whether medical team approached first, compensation offered, and type of consent. For retention: Number of family members enrolled and completed initial follow-up visit, mode of follow-up, location of follow-up visit, data collection method, timing of follow-up visits, number of follow-up visits, and compensation offered. Recruitment (participants approached/enrolled) and retention (participants enrolled/completed initial follow-up) percentage were calculated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There were 51 studies in the analysis. The mean recruitment percentage was 49.3% ± 24.3%. There were no differences in recruitment percentage by study country, ICU type, recruitment approach, or whether the medical team approached the family member first (all p > 0.05). The mean retention percentage for the initial follow-up visit was 81.6% ± 18.0%. There were no differences in retention percentage by mode of participant contact, data collection type, or follow-up location (all p > 0.05). Minimal data were available to determine the impact of time of day approached and compensation on recruitment and retention outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

About half of family members of ICU patients approached participated in trials and more than eight in ten completed the initial follow-up visit. We did not identify specific factors that impacted family recruitment or retention. There is a strong need for further studies to characterize optimal strategies to ensure family participation in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

综述成人 ICU 中随机家庭为中心的干预性研究的招募和保留策略。

资料来源

从建库到 2023 年 2 月,检索 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。

研究选择

在 ICU 环境中进行家庭为中心干预的随机对照试验,报告至少一个家庭为中心的结局,并被纳入我们之前发表的系统综述。

资料提取

招募:接触并纳入的家庭成员数量、接触方式、地点、接触时间、医疗团队是否首先接触、提供的补偿以及同意类型。保留:纳入并完成初始随访的家庭成员数量、随访方式、随访地点、随访数据收集方法、随访时间、随访次数和提供的补偿。计算招募(接触/纳入的参与者)和保留(纳入/完成初始随访的参与者)百分比。

资料综合

分析中共有 51 项研究。招募百分比的平均值为 49.3%±24.3%。研究国家、ICU 类型、招募方式或医疗团队是否首先接触家庭成员对招募百分比均无差异(均 P>0.05)。初始随访的保留百分比平均值为 81.6%±18.0%。参与者联系方式、数据收集类型或随访地点对保留百分比均无差异(均 P>0.05)。可用数据很少,无法确定接触时间和补偿对招募和保留结果的影响。

结论

约一半的 ICU 患者家属参与了试验,超过十分之八的人完成了初始随访。我们没有发现影响家庭招募或保留的特定因素。需要进一步研究以确定确保家庭参与临床试验的最佳策略。

相似文献

1
Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Randomized Clinical Trials Involving Family Members of ICU Patients.
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jun 24;6(7):e1112. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001112. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
4
5
Recruitment and retention rates in behavioral trials involving patients and a support person: a systematic review.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):307-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
Monitoring strategies for clinical intervention studies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 8;12(12):MR000051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000051.pub2.
7
Diaries for recovery from critical illness.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 9;2014(12):CD010468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010468.pub2.
8
The Impact of Randomized Family-Centered Interventions on Family-Centered Outcomes in the Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Aug;38(8):690-701. doi: 10.1177/08850666231173868. Epub 2023 May 9.
9
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;2015(10):CD008808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
The Impact of Randomized Family-Centered Interventions on Family-Centered Outcomes in the Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Aug;38(8):690-701. doi: 10.1177/08850666231173868. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Patient and family engagement in patient care and research in Canadian intensive care units: a national survey.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;69(12):1527-1536. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02342-w. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Family Engagement in Critical Care Cardiology: A Guide for Clinicians.
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Apr;39(4):562-565. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Daily Written Care Summaries for Families of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;50(9):1296-1305. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005583. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 6;3(3):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3.
8
The impact of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation video on reducing surrogates' anxiety: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
J Crit Care. 2021 Apr;62:235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验