Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
German Institute for Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 2024 Aug 1;47(8):1449-1456. doi: 10.2337/dc23-1507.
The relationship between depression, diabetes, and access to diabetes care is established in high-income countries (HICs) but not in middle-income countries (MICs), where contexts and health systems differ and may impact this relationship. In this study, we investigate access to diabetes care for individuals with and without depressive symptoms in MICs.
We analyzed pooled data from nationally representative household surveys across Brazil, Chile, China, Indonesia, and Mexico. Validated survey tools Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Short Form, and Patient Health Questionnaire identified participants with depressive symptoms. Diabetes, defined per World Health Organization Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions guidelines, included self-reported medication use and biochemical data. The primary focus was on tracking diabetes care progression through the stages of diagnosis, treatment, and glycemic control. Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses, accounting for gender, age, education, and BMI, examined diabetes prevalence and care continuum progression.
The pooled sample included 18,301 individuals aged 50 years and above; 3,309 (18.1%) had diabetes, and 3,934 (21.5%) exhibited depressive symptoms. Diabetes prevalence was insignificantly higher among those with depressive symptoms (28.9%) compared with those without (23.8%, P = 0.071). Co-occurrence of diabetes and depression was associated with increased odds of diabetes detection (odds ratio [OR] 1.398, P < 0.001) and treatment (OR 1.344, P < 0.001), but not with higher odds of glycemic control (OR 0.913, P = 0.377).
In MICs, individuals aged 50 years and older with diabetes and depression showed heightened diabetes identification and treatment probabilities, unlike patterns seen in HICs. This underscores the unique interplay of these conditions in different income settings.
在高收入国家(HICs)中,抑郁、糖尿病和获得糖尿病护理之间的关系已经确立,但在中低收入国家(MICs)中尚未确立,这些国家的背景和卫生系统有所不同,可能会影响这种关系。在这项研究中,我们调查了 MICs 中患有和不患有抑郁症状的个体获得糖尿病护理的情况。
我们分析了来自巴西、智利、中国、印度尼西亚和墨西哥的全国代表性家庭调查的汇总数据。经过验证的调查工具包括中心流行病学研究抑郁量表修订版、综合国际诊断访谈、简短形式和患者健康问卷,用于识别患有抑郁症状的参与者。根据世界卫生组织基本非传染性疾病干预包的指南,糖尿病的定义包括自我报告的药物使用和生化数据。主要重点是通过诊断、治疗和血糖控制的阶段来跟踪糖尿病护理的进展。描述性和多变量逻辑回归分析,考虑到性别、年龄、教育程度和 BMI,检查了糖尿病的患病率和护理连续体的进展。
汇总样本包括 18301 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的个体;其中 3309 人(18.1%)患有糖尿病,3934 人(21.5%)患有抑郁症状。患有抑郁症状的个体的糖尿病患病率(28.9%)与没有抑郁症状的个体(23.8%)相比没有显著差异(P=0.071)。糖尿病和抑郁症同时存在与糖尿病检测(优势比[OR] 1.398,P<0.001)和治疗(OR 1.344,P<0.001)的几率增加有关,但与血糖控制几率增加无关(OR 0.913,P=0.377)。
在 MICs 中,年龄在 50 岁及以上的患有糖尿病和抑郁症的个体表现出更高的糖尿病识别和治疗可能性,与 HICs 中的模式不同。这突显了这些疾病在不同收入环境下的独特相互作用。