Kim Na-Hyun, Yang Byoung-Eun, Kang Sam-Hee, Kim Young-Hee, Na Ji-Yeon, Kim Jo-Eun, Byun Soo-Hwan
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14066, Republic of Korea.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14066, Republic of Korea.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jun 7;11(6):576. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060576.
This study assessed AI-processed low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images for single-tooth diagnosis. Human-equivalent phantoms were used to evaluate CBCT image quality with a focus on the right mandibular first molar. Two CBCT machines were used for evaluation. The first CBCT machine was used for the experimental group, in which images were acquired using four protocols and enhanced with AI processing to improve quality. The other machine was used for the control group, where images were taken in one protocol without AI processing. The dose-area product (DAP) was measured for each protocol. Subjective clinical image quality was assessed twice by five dentists, with a 2-month interval in between, using 11 parameters and a six-point rating scale. Agreement and statistical significance were assessed with Fleiss' kappa coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient. The AI-processed protocols exhibited lower DAP/field of view values than non-processed protocols, while demonstrating subjective clinical evaluation results comparable to those of non-processed protocols. The Fleiss' kappa coefficient value revealed statistical significance and substantial agreement. The intra-class correlation coefficient showed statistical significance and almost perfect agreement. These findings highlight the importance of minimizing radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic quality as the usage of CBCT increases in single-tooth diagnosis.
本研究评估了人工智能处理的低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像用于单颗牙齿诊断的情况。使用人体等效体模评估CBCT图像质量,重点关注右下第一磨牙。使用两台CBCT机器进行评估。第一台CBCT机器用于实验组,在该组中,使用四种方案采集图像并通过人工智能处理进行增强以提高质量。另一台机器用于对照组,在该组中,按照一种方案采集图像且不进行人工智能处理。测量每个方案的剂量面积乘积(DAP)。由五名牙医对主观临床图像质量进行两次评估,两次评估间隔2个月,使用11个参数和六点评分量表。使用Fleiss卡方系数和组内相关系数评估一致性和统计学显著性。与未处理的方案相比,经过人工智能处理的方案显示出更低的DAP/视野值,同时主观临床评估结果与未处理的方案相当。Fleiss卡方系数值显示出统计学显著性和高度一致性。组内相关系数显示出统计学显著性和几乎完美的一致性。随着CBCT在单颗牙齿诊断中的使用增加,这些发现凸显了在保持诊断质量的同时将辐射暴露降至最低的重要性。