Suppr超能文献

精神障碍与激进化过程之间是否存在关系?系统综述。

Is There a Relationship between Psychotic Disorders and the Radicalization Process? A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 1;60(6):926. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060926.

Abstract

: Radicalization, a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, has been a subject of increasing concern in recent years, particularly due to its potential connection to acts of mass violence and terrorism. This systematic review examines the intricate link between radicalization and psychotic disorders, utilizing various sources such as observational studies, case reports, and series. It aims to highlight the prevalence of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders among radicalized individuals and to define the role of mental health professionals in dealing with this issue, contributing to the development of prevention and treatment strategies. : The methodology involved an extensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and APA PsycINFO up to 1 February 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The study focused on radicalization and psychotic disorders as defined by DSM-5 criteria, excluding other mental disorders. A population sample of 41 radicalized individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders was selected, among which schizophrenia was identified as the predominant condition. : It was observed that 24% of these individuals passed away soon after committing their crimes, leading the researchers to rely on retrospective data for their diagnoses. The use of diverse assessment tools for psychiatric diagnosis and the lack of a standardized method for diagnosing or assessing involvement in the radicalization process were also noted. Despite limitations like reliance on observational studies and case reports, which result in low evidence quality and varied methodologies, our work provides a valuable contribution to clarifying the relationship between radicalization and psychotic disorders. However, further clinical studies are needed to delve deeper into these aspects. : In conclusion, our review points out that individuals with psychotic disorders do not have a higher crime rate than the general population and warns against associating crimes with mental illness due to the stigma it creates. The lack of uniform psychiatric diagnostic tools and radicalization assessment highlights the need for more standardized risk assessment tools and validated scales in psychiatric diagnosis to better understand the relationship between radicalization and psychotic disorders and to develop integrated protocols.

摘要

: 激进化是一个复杂且多方面的现象,近年来引起了越来越多的关注,尤其是因为它可能与大规模暴力和恐怖主义行为有关。本系统综述利用观察性研究、病例报告和系列研究等多种来源,研究了激进化与精神病障碍之间的复杂联系。其目的是强调精神分裂症谱系和其他精神病障碍在激进化个体中的普遍存在,并确定心理健康专业人员在处理这一问题中的作用,为制定预防和治疗策略做出贡献。: 该研究方法包括在 2024 年 2 月 1 日之前在 PubMed、Scopus 和 APA PsycINFO 上进行广泛的文献检索,遵循 PRISMA 指南。该研究侧重于根据 DSM-5 标准定义的激进化和精神病障碍,排除了其他精神障碍。选择了 41 名被诊断患有精神病障碍的激进化个体作为研究对象,其中精神分裂症是主要疾病。: 研究观察到,其中 24%的个体在犯罪后不久就去世了,这使得研究人员只能依靠回顾性数据进行诊断。研究还注意到,用于精神病诊断的评估工具多种多样,以及缺乏标准化的方法来诊断或评估参与激进化过程。尽管存在依赖观察性研究和病例报告的局限性,导致证据质量低且方法多样,但我们的工作为澄清激进化与精神病障碍之间的关系提供了有价值的贡献。然而,需要进一步的临床研究来深入探讨这些方面。: 总之,我们的综述指出,患有精神病障碍的个体的犯罪率并不高于普通人群,并警告不要因精神病而将犯罪与犯罪联系起来,因为这会造成污名化。缺乏统一的精神病诊断工具和激进化评估工具突出表明需要更多标准化的风险评估工具和经过验证的精神病诊断量表,以更好地理解激进化与精神病障碍之间的关系,并制定综合协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1733/11205664/0712690e7ce8/medicina-60-00926-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验