Praca Charlotte, Sakalihasan Natzi, Defraigne Jean-Olivier, Labropoulos Nicos, Albert Adelin, Seidel Laurence, Musumeci Lucia
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Surgical Research Center, GIGA-Metabolism & Cardiovascular Biology Domain, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 17;13(12):3551. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123551.
Diabetes has a protective effect on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs); however, there are contrasting reports on the impact of diabetes on endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) outcomes, endoleaks (ELs) being the major negative outcome. The present study characterizes ELs and their outcomes in AAA patients, diabetic or not. This single-center, retrospective, comparative study was carried out on 324 AAA patients who underwent elective EVARs between 2007 and 2016 at the University Hospital of Liège (Belgium). The primary endpoint was the incidence and effect of ELs on the evolution of the aneurysmal sac; the secondary endpoints were surgical reintervention and mortality rate. Diabetic and non-diabetic patients were compared with respect to various risk factors by logistic regression, while a Cox regression was used to analyze survival. In AAA patients meeting the inclusion criteria (n = 248), 23% were diabetic. EL incidence was comparable ( = 0.74) in diabetic (38.7%) vs. non-diabetic (43.9%) patients. EL risk factors were age (HR = 1.04, = 0.014) and fibrate intake (HR = 3.12, = 0.043). A significant association was observed between ELs and aneurysm sac enlargement ( < 0.001), regardless of group ( = 0.46). Aneurysm sac regression per month for non-diabetic patients was -0.24 ± 0.013, while for diabetics it was -0.18 ± 0.027 ( = 0.059). Dyslipidemia (HR = 3.01, = 0.0060) and sulfonylureas (HR = 8.43, = 0.043) were associated with shorter EL duration, while diabetes (HR = 0.080, = 0.038) and beta blockers (HR = 0.46, = 0.036) were associated with longer EL duration. The likelihood of reoperation decreased with more recent surgery (OR = 0.90, = 0.040), regardless of diabetic status. All-cause mortality was higher for the non-diabetic group (45.5% vs. 26.3%, = 0.0096). Endoleak occurrence is a known risk factor for sac expansion. In diabetic patients, endoleaks lasted longer, and regression of the aneurysm sac tended to be slower. The number and type of reintervention was not related to the diabetic status of AAA patients, but overall survival was higher in patients with diabetes.
糖尿病对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)具有保护作用;然而,关于糖尿病对血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)结果的影响却存在相互矛盾的报道,内漏(ELs)是主要的负面结果。本研究对AAA患者(无论是否患有糖尿病)的内漏及其结果进行了特征描述。这项单中心、回顾性、对照研究针对2007年至2016年期间在列日大学医院(比利时)接受择期EVAR的324例AAA患者开展。主要终点是内漏的发生率及其对动脉瘤囊演变的影响;次要终点是手术再次干预和死亡率。通过逻辑回归比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的各种风险因素,同时使用Cox回归分析生存率。在符合纳入标准的AAA患者(n = 248)中,23%患有糖尿病。糖尿病患者(38.7%)与非糖尿病患者(43.9%)的内漏发生率相当(P = 0.74)。内漏的风险因素为年龄(HR = 1.04,P = 0.014)和贝特类药物摄入(HR = 3.12,P = 0.043)。无论组别如何,均观察到内漏与动脉瘤囊增大之间存在显著关联(P < 0.001),(P = 0.46)。非糖尿病患者的动脉瘤囊每月缩小-0.24±0.013,而糖尿病患者为-0.18±0.027(P = 0.059)。血脂异常(HR = 3.01,P = 0.0060)和磺脲类药物(HR = 8.43,P = 0.043)与内漏持续时间较短相关,而糖尿病(HR = 0.080,P = 0.038)和β受体阻滞剂(HR = 0.46,P = 0.036)与内漏持续时间较长相关。无论糖尿病状态如何,再次手术的可能性随着手术时间的推移而降低(OR = 0.90,P = 0.040)。非糖尿病组的全因死亡率更高(45.5%对26.3%,P = 0.0096)。内漏的发生是动脉瘤囊扩张的已知风险因素。在糖尿病患者中,内漏持续时间更长,且动脉瘤囊的缩小往往更慢。再次干预的次数和类型与AAA患者的糖尿病状态无关,但糖尿病患者的总体生存率更高。