Suppr超能文献

泰国省级酒精控制政策实施能力综合指数

A composite index of provincial alcohol control policy implementation capacity in Thailand.

机构信息

SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, Massey University, 90 Symonds Street, Grafton Auckland, 1010, New Zealand; International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanond Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.

SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, Massey University, 90 Symonds Street, Grafton Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Aug;130:104504. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104504. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a well-published literature on the effectiveness and stringency of alcohol control policies, but not many studies focus on policy implementation, where policies transform into impact. The objective of this study is to create a composite index that measures the capacity for implementing effective alcohol control policies across all provinces in Thailand.

METHODS

Based on the international literature, we developed a list of key indicators for tracking the implementation of alcohol policies at the subnational level. To ensure these indicators were relevant to the Thai context, we obtained feedback from Thai experts. We collected primary data according to the developed indicators using questionnaires filled in by key informants at the implementing agencies and gathered secondary data at the provincial level. On this basis, we developed indices that reflect the status of alcohol control policy implementation. We then investigated the association between the indices and the prevalence and pattern of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms while adjusting for potential confounders using multiple linear regression and negative binomial regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Scores on the Provincial Alcohol Policy Implementation Capacity (PAPIC) Index ranged between 39 and 79. We found that each 1-point increase in PAPIC score was associated with a 1.98 % reduction in the quantity of alcohol consumed in grams per day (coefficient: -0.02; 95 %CI: -0.03, -0.00; p-value<0.05; e= 0.9802). We also found that for each 1-point increase in PAPIC score, the proportion of regular drinkers reduced by 0.30 per cent (coefficient: -0.30; 95 %CI: -0.55, -0.05; p-value<0.05). However, we did not find any association between the indices and alcohol-related harms.

CONCLUSION

The level of implementation of alcohol control policy at the sub-national level is associated with alcohol consumption levels. The findings suggest the value of allocating resources to the implementation of alcohol control policy.

摘要

背景

关于酒精控制政策的有效性和严格性,已有大量文献记载,但很少有研究关注政策的实施情况,即政策如何转化为实际影响。本研究的目的是创建一个综合指数,以衡量泰国所有省份实施有效酒精控制政策的能力。

方法

根据国际文献,我们制定了一份跟踪国家以下各级执行酒精政策的关键指标清单。为确保这些指标与泰国国情相关,我们征求了泰国专家的反馈意见。我们根据制定的指标,通过实施机构的主要知情人填写问卷收集主要数据,并在省级层面收集次要数据。在此基础上,我们开发了反映酒精控制政策实施状况的指数。然后,我们使用多元线性回归和负二项回归分别调整潜在混杂因素后,调查了这些指数与酒精消费的流行程度和模式以及与酒精相关的危害之间的关联。

结果

省级酒精政策实施能力指数(PAPIC)得分在 39 至 79 之间。我们发现,PAPIC 得分每增加 1 分,每日摄入的酒精量(系数:-0.02;95%置信区间:-0.03,-0.00;p 值<0.05;e=0.9802)就会减少 1.98%。我们还发现,PAPIC 得分每增加 1 分,规律饮酒者的比例就会降低 0.30%(系数:-0.30;95%置信区间:-0.55,-0.05;p 值<0.05)。然而,我们没有发现这些指数与酒精相关危害之间存在任何关联。

结论

国家以下各级执行酒精控制政策的水平与酒精消费水平有关。研究结果表明,将资源分配给执行酒精控制政策具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验