• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生和药剂师合作优化患者用药:英国一项初级保健临床试验中的定性研究。

Collaborative discussions between GPs and pharmacists to optimise patient medication: a qualitative study within a UK primary care clinical trial.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care (CAPC), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.

School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Oct 31;74(748):e727-e734. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0190. Print 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0190
PMID:38950941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11466292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been significant investment in pharmacists working in UK general practice to improve the effective and safe use of medicines. However, evidence of how to optimise collaboration between GPs and pharmacists in the context of polypharmacy (multiple medication) is lacking.

AIM

To explore GP and pharmacist views and experiences of in-person, interprofessional collaborative discussions (IPCDs) as part of a complex intervention to optimise medication use for patients with polypharmacy in general practice.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A mixed-method process evaluation embedded within the Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP) trial conducted in Bristol and the West Midlands, between February 2021 and September 2023.

METHOD

Audio-recordings of IPCDs between GPs and pharmacists, along with individual semi-structured interviews to explore their reflections on these discussions, were used. All recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

A total of 14 practices took part in the process evaluation from February 2022 to September 2023; 17 IPCD meetings were audio-recorded, discussing 30 patients (range 1-6 patients per meeting). In all, six GPs and 13 pharmacists were interviewed. The IPCD was highly valued by GPs and pharmacists who described benefits, including: strengthening their working relationship; gaining in confidence to manage more complex patients; and learning from each other. It was often challenging, however, to find time for the IPCDs.

CONCLUSION

The model of IPCD used in this study provided protected time for GPs and pharmacists to work together to deliver whole-patient care, with both professions finding this beneficial. Protected time for interprofessional liaison and collaboration, and structured interventions may facilitate improved patient care.

摘要

背景

英国在让药剂师参与到全科医疗实践中以提高药物使用的有效性和安全性方面投入了大量资金。然而,在多药治疗(多种药物治疗)的背景下,如何优化全科医生和药剂师之间的合作关系,目前还缺乏证据。

目的

探索全科医生和药剂师对面对面的、专业性合作讨论(IPC)的看法和经验,作为优化全科医疗中多药治疗患者药物使用的一项复杂干预措施的一部分。

设计和环境

这是一项混合方法的过程评估,嵌入在 2021 年 2 月至 2023 年 9 月在布里斯托尔和西米德兰兹进行的《改善初级保健中多药治疗患者的药物使用(IMPPP)》试验中。

方法

使用全科医生和药剂师之间的 IPC 录音以及个体半结构化访谈,以探讨他们对这些讨论的反思。所有录音都逐字转录并进行主题分析。

结果

2022 年 2 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,共有 14 家诊所参与了该过程评估;共记录了 17 次 IPCD 会议,讨论了 30 名患者(每次会议 1-6 名患者不等)。共有 6 名全科医生和 13 名药剂师接受了访谈。IPC 受到全科医生和药剂师的高度重视,他们描述了其益处,包括:加强他们的工作关系;增强管理更复杂患者的信心;以及相互学习。然而,找到时间进行 IPCD 往往具有挑战性。

结论

在这项研究中使用的 IPCD 模式为全科医生和药剂师提供了合作提供整体患者护理的时间保障,双方都认为这是有益的。为专业间联系和合作提供的时间保障和结构化干预措施可能有助于改善患者护理。

相似文献

1
Collaborative discussions between GPs and pharmacists to optimise patient medication: a qualitative study within a UK primary care clinical trial.全科医生和药剂师合作优化患者用药:英国一项初级保健临床试验中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Oct 31;74(748):e727-e734. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0190. Print 2024 Nov.
2
Barriers and enablers to collaborative working between GPs and pharmacists: a qualitative interview study.全科医生与药剂师之间协作的障碍和促进因素:一项定性访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Feb 27;70(692):e155-e163. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708197. Print 2020 Mar.
3
Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care.药物审查的效率与彻底性:英国初级医疗中的定性访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;69(680):e190-e198. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701321. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Qualitative study to conceptualise a model of interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners to support patients' adherence to medication.定性研究,旨在构建药剂师与全科医生之间跨专业协作的模型,以支持患者坚持服药。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 16;6(3):e010488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010488.
5
Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration of general practitioners and community pharmacists - a qualitative study.全科医生与社区药剂师跨专业合作的认知——一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2157-8.
6
Perspectives of general practitioners about a collaborative asthma care model in primary care.全科医生对初级保健中协作式哮喘护理模式的看法。
J Asthma. 2021 Dec;58(12):1648-1660. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1823408. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
7
General practitioners' and nurses' views on medication reviews and potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly patients - a qualitative study of reports by educating pharmacists.全科医生和护士对老年患者药物评估及潜在不适当用药的看法——一项基于药师教育报告的定性研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):329-341. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1487458. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
8
General practitioners' views of pharmacists' current and potential contributions to medication review and prescribing in New Zealand.新西兰全科医生对药剂师在药物评估及处方开具方面当前及潜在贡献的看法。
J Prim Health Care. 2013 Sep 1;5(3):223-33.
9
Non-dispensing pharmacists integrated into general practices as a new interprofessional model: a qualitative evaluation of general practitioners' experiences and views.作为一种新的跨专业模式融入全科医疗的非配药药剂师:对全科医生经验和观点的定性评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10703-y.
10
General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice: a qualitative interview study.全科医生对在全科医疗中工作的药剂师的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 Mar 28;40(2):377-386. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac115.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying risks in dementia care: Insights from a qualitative study with clinical pharmacists.识别痴呆症护理中的风险:来自与临床药剂师的定性研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325472. eCollection 2025.
2
Confidence, Barriers, and Role Identity of General Practice Independent Pharmacist Prescribers in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰全科独立药剂师处方者的信心、障碍与角色认同
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;13(8):933. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080933.