Suppr超能文献

高级实践护理研究的全球视角:系统评价综述。

A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Susan E. French Chair in Nursing Research and Innovative Practice, Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-EMTL), Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 2;19(7):e0305008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305008. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). A clearer understanding of the impact of these roles will inform global priorities for advanced practice nursing education, research, and policy.

OBJECTIVE

To identify gaps in advanced practice nursing research globally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Healthstar, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, DARE, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and Web of Science from January 2011 onwards, with no restrictions on jurisdiction or language. Grey literature and hand searches of reference lists were undertaken. Review quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Study selection, data extraction and CASP assessments were done independently by two reviewers. We extracted study characteristics, country and outcome data. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We screened 5840 articles and retained 117 systematic reviews, representing 38 countries. Most CASP criteria were met. However, study selection by two reviewers was done inconsistently and language and geographical restrictions were applied. We found highly consistent evidence that APN, NP and CNS care was equal or superior to the comparator (e.g., physicians) for 29 indicator categories across a wide range of clinical settings, patient populations and acuity levels. Mixed findings were noted for quality of life, consultations, costs, emergency room visits, and health care service delivery where some studies favoured the control groups. No indicator consistently favoured the control group. There is emerging research related to Artificial Intelligence (AI).

CONCLUSION

There is a large body of advanced practice nursing research globally, but several WHO regions are underrepresented. Identified research gaps include AI, interprofessional team functioning, workload, and patients and families as partners in healthcare.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021278532.

摘要

简介

世界卫生组织(WHO)呼吁扩大所有护理角色,包括高级实践护士(APN)、护士从业者(NP)和临床护理专家(CNS)。更清楚地了解这些角色的影响将为全球高级实践护理教育、研究和政策提供优先事项。

目的

确定全球高级实践护理研究中的差距。

材料和方法

对系统评价进行了综述。我们从 2011 年 1 月开始在 CINAHL、Embase、全球健康、Healthstar、PubMed、Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、DARE、Joanna Briggs 研究所 EBP 和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索,对管辖权或语言没有限制。进行了灰色文献和参考文献的手工搜索。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)评估审查质量。研究选择、数据提取和 CASP 评估由两名评审员独立进行。我们提取了研究特征、国家和结果数据。使用叙述性综合法总结数据。

结果

我们筛选了 5840 篇文章,保留了 117 篇系统评价,代表 38 个国家。大多数 CASP 标准都得到了满足。然而,两名评审员的研究选择不一致,并且应用了语言和地理限制。我们发现,在广泛的临床环境、患者人群和疾病严重程度下,APN、NP 和 CNS 护理在 29 个指标类别中与对照(例如医生)相等或优越的高度一致证据。在生活质量、咨询、成本、急诊就诊和医疗保健服务提供方面,也存在混合发现,一些研究支持对照组。没有指标一致地支持对照组。人工智能(AI)相关的新兴研究。

结论

全球范围内有大量高级实践护理研究,但几个世界卫生组织区域的代表性不足。确定的研究差距包括人工智能、多专业团队功能、工作量以及患者和家庭作为医疗保健合作伙伴。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021278532。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95c/11218965/c769dd334d4e/pone.0305008.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验