Flyvholm Anne-Mai, Johansen Birgitte Schepelern
Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Front Sociol. 2024 Jun 18;9:1347803. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1347803. eCollection 2024.
This article investigates feelings of (un)safety emerging from knowing and sharing knowledge about hate crime and hate incidents. Drawing on fieldwork and interviews with young Muslims living in the greater Copenhagen area, the article explores the way the interlocutors seek to make sense of their experiences through available epistemic categories, and how this sense-making is shaped by reactions from the surrounding society, e.g., whether it is questioned, supported, ignored etc. Combining criminological and psychological research on direct and indirect harms of hate crime with insights from philosophy on epistemic encounters and their ethical implications the article provides a framework for investigating safety in epistemic interactions. Based on this framework, the article show the often hard work that people perform in order to balance epistemic needs (e.g. the need for knowledge and for recognition) with epistemic risks (e.g. the risk of testimonial rejection, of damaged epistemic confidence, or loss of credibility).
本文探讨了因了解和分享仇恨犯罪及仇恨事件的知识而产生的(不)安全感。基于对哥本哈根大区年轻穆斯林的实地调查和访谈,本文探究了受访者如何试图通过现有的认知范畴来理解自身经历,以及这种理解是如何受到周围社会反应(例如,是否受到质疑、支持、忽视等)影响的。本文将关于仇恨犯罪直接和间接危害的犯罪学及心理学研究,与哲学中关于认知遭遇及其伦理影响的见解相结合,提供了一个调查认知互动中安全感的框架。基于这一框架,本文展示了人们为平衡认知需求(例如对知识和认可的需求)与认知风险(例如证言被拒、认知信心受损或信誉丧失的风险)而经常付出的艰苦努力。