Ahluwalia Tania, Singh Sukhpreet, Gandhi Navvin, Toy Serkan, Douglass Katherine, Blanchard Janice, Davey Kevin
Children's National Health System, Division of Emergency Medicine, 111 Michigan Avenue, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Max Healthcare Saket, Delhi, India.
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 3;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00653-x.
Workplace violence (WPV) in Emergency Departments (EDs) is an increasingly recognized challenge healthcare providers face in low-resource settings. While studies have highlighted the increased prevalence of WPV in healthcare, most of the existing research has been conducted in developed countries with established laws and repercussions for violence against healthcare providers. More data on WPV against ED providers practicing in low-resource settings is necessary to understand these providers' unique challenges.
This study aims to gain insight into the incidence and characteristics of WPV among ED healthcare providers in India.
This study was conducted at two EDs in geographically distinct regions of India. A survey was designed to assess violence in EDs among healthcare providers. Surveys were distributed to ED workplace providers, completed by hand, and returned anonymously. Data was entered and stored in the RedCAP database to facilitate analysis.
Two hundred surveys were completed by physicians, nurses, and paramedics in Indian EDs. Most reported events involved verbal abuse (68%), followed by physical abuse (26%), outside confrontation (17%), and stalking (5%). By far, the most common perpetrators of violence against healthcare workers were bystanders including patient family members or other accompanying individuals. Notably, reporting was limited, with most cases conveyed to ED or hospital administration.
These results underscore the prevalence of WPV among Indian ED healthcare providers. High rates of verbal abuse followed by physical abuse are of concern. Most perpetrators of WPV against healthcare providers in this study were patient family members or bystanders rather than the patients themselves. It is imperative to prioritize implementing prevention strategies to create safer work environments for healthcare workers.
急诊科的工作场所暴力是医疗服务提供者在资源匮乏环境中面临的一项日益受到关注的挑战。虽然研究强调了医疗行业中工作场所暴力的患病率有所上升,但现有的大多数研究都是在对暴力侵害医疗服务提供者有既定法律和惩处措施的发达国家进行的。需要更多关于在资源匮乏环境中工作的急诊科医护人员遭受工作场所暴力的数据,以了解这些医护人员面临的独特挑战。
本研究旨在深入了解印度急诊科医护人员遭受工作场所暴力的发生率和特征。
本研究在印度两个地理位置不同的地区的急诊科进行。设计了一项调查,以评估医护人员在急诊科遭受的暴力情况。调查问卷分发给急诊科工作场所的医护人员,由他们手工填写并匿名返回。数据录入并存储在RedCAP数据库中以便于分析。
印度急诊科的医生、护士和护理人员共完成了200份调查问卷。大多数报告的事件涉及言语辱骂(68%),其次是身体虐待(26%)、外部冲突(17%)和跟踪骚扰(5%)。到目前为止,暴力侵害医护人员最常见的肇事者是旁观者,包括患者家属或其他陪同人员。值得注意的是,报告情况有限,大多数案件仅告知了急诊科或医院管理层。
这些结果突显了印度急诊科医护人员遭受工作场所暴力的普遍程度。言语辱骂率高,其次是身体虐待,令人担忧。在本研究中,暴力侵害医护人员的大多数肇事者是患者家属或旁观者,而非患者本人。必须优先实施预防策略,为医护人员创造更安全的工作环境。