School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Science, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG), Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14130. doi: 10.1111/hex.14130.
There is currently limited guidance for researchers on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for preclinical spinal cord research, leading to uncertainty about design and implementation. This study aimed to develop evidence-informed principles to support preclinical spinal cord researchers to incorporate PPI into their research.
This study used a modified Delphi method with the aim of establishing consensus on a set of principles for PPI in spinal cord research. Thirty-eight stakeholders including researchers, clinicians and people living with spinal cord injury took part in the expert panel. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with a series of statements relating to PPI in preclinical spinal cord research over two rounds. As part of Round 2, they were also asked to rate statements as essential or desirable.
Thirty-eight statements were included in Round 1, after which five statements were amended and two additional statements were added. After Round 2, consensus (> 75% agreement) was reached for a total of 27 principles, with 13 rated as essential and 14 rated as desirable. The principles with highest agreement related to diversity in representation among PPI contributors, clarity of the purpose of PPI and effective communication.
This research developed a previously unavailable set of evidence-informed principles to inform PPI in preclinical spinal cord research. These principles provide guidance for researchers seeking to conduct PPI in preclinical spinal cord research and may also inform PPI in other preclinical disciplines.
This study was conducted as part of a project aiming to develop PPI in preclinical spinal cord injury research associated with an ongoing research collaboration funded by the Irish Rugby Football Union Charitable Trust (IRFU CT) and the Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (SFI AMBER), with research conducted by the Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG) at the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences. The project aims to develop an advanced biomaterials platform for spinal cord repair and includes a PPI Advisory Panel comprising researchers, clinicians and seriously injured rugby players to oversee the work of the project. PPI is included in this study through the involvement of members of the PPI Advisory Panel in the conceptualisation of this research, review of findings, identification of key points for discussion and preparation of the study manuscript as co-authors.
目前,针对临床前脊髓研究的患者和公众参与(PPI),研究人员可获得的指导非常有限,这导致在设计和实施方面存在不确定性。本研究旨在制定循证原则,以支持临床前脊髓研究人员将 PPI 纳入其研究。
本研究采用改良 Delphi 法,旨在就一套用于脊髓研究的 PPI 原则达成共识。包括研究人员、临床医生和脊髓损伤患者在内的 38 名利益相关者参加了专家小组。参与者被要求在两轮中对与临床前脊髓研究中的 PPI 相关的一系列陈述的同意程度进行评分。在第二轮中,他们还被要求对陈述进行评分,判断其为必要或可取。
第一轮包含 38 项陈述,之后修改了 5 项陈述,并添加了另外 2 项陈述。第二轮后,就总共 27 项原则达成了共识(>75%的同意),其中 13 项被评为必要,14 项被评为可取。意见最一致的原则涉及 PPI 贡献者的代表性多样性、PPI 的目的明确性和有效沟通。
本研究制定了一套以前无法获得的循证原则,为临床前脊髓研究中的 PPI 提供了信息。这些原则为寻求在临床前脊髓研究中进行 PPI 的研究人员提供了指导,也可能为其他临床前学科的 PPI 提供信息。
本研究是开发与爱尔兰橄榄球联盟慈善信托基金(IRFU CT)和科学基金会爱尔兰先进材料和生物工程研究中心(SFI AMBER)正在进行的研究合作相关的临床前脊髓损伤研究中的 PPI 的项目的一部分,由 RCSI 大学医学与健康科学的组织工程研究小组(TERG)进行。该项目旨在开发一种用于脊髓修复的先进生物材料平台,其中包括一个由研究人员、临床医生和严重受伤的橄榄球运动员组成的 PPI 顾问小组,负责监督项目的工作。通过 PPI 顾问小组成员参与本研究的概念化、审查研究结果、确定讨论要点和作为共同作者准备研究手稿,本研究纳入了 PPI。