Centre for Health Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
William Harvey Research Institute, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0303932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303932. eCollection 2024.
Over the last decade, the strain on the English National Health Service (NHS) has increased. This has been especially felt by acute hospital trusts where the volume of admissions has steadily increased. Patient outcomes, including inpatient mortality, vary between trusts. The extent to which these differences are explained by systems-based factors, and whether they are avoidable, is unclear. Few studies have investigated these relationships. A systems-based methodology recognises the complexity of influences on healthcare outcomes. Rather than clinical interventions alone, the resources supporting a patient's treatment journey have near-equal importance. This paper first identifies suitable metrics of resource and demand within healthcare delivery from routinely collected, publicly available, hospital-level data. Then it proceeds to use univariate and multivariable linear regression to associate such systems-based factors with standardised mortality. Three sequential cross-sectional analyses were performed, spanning the last decade. The results of the univariate regression analyses show clear relationships between five out of the six selected predictor variables and standardised mortality. When these five predicators are included within a multivariable regression analysis, they reliably explain approximately 36% of the variation in standardised mortality between hospital trusts. Three factors are consistently statistically significant: the number of doctors per hospital bed, bed occupancy, and the percentage of patients who are placed in a bed within four hours after a decision to admit them. Of these, the number of doctors per bed had the strongest effect. Linear regression assumption testing and a robustness analysis indicate the observations have internal validity. However, our empirical strategy cannot determine causality and our findings should not be interpreted as established causal relationships. This study provides hypothesis-generating evidence of significant relationships between systems-based factors of healthcare delivery and standardised mortality. These have relevance to clinicians and policymakers alike. While identifying causal relationships between the predictors is left to the future, it establishes an important paradigm for further research.
在过去的十年中,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的压力不断增加。这在急症医院信托中尤为明显,因为入院人数稳步增加。患者的治疗效果(包括住院死亡率)在不同的信托机构之间存在差异。这些差异在多大程度上可以用基于系统的因素来解释,以及它们是否可以避免,目前还不清楚。很少有研究调查过这些关系。基于系统的方法认识到影响医疗保健结果的复杂性。除了临床干预措施外,支持患者治疗过程的资源也具有同等重要的地位。本文首先从常规收集的、公开的、医院层面的数据中确定医疗服务提供中合适的资源和需求指标。然后,它接着使用单变量和多变量线性回归来将这些基于系统的因素与标准化死亡率联系起来。进行了三个连续的横断面分析,跨越了过去十年。单变量回归分析的结果表明,在六个选定的预测变量中有五个与标准化死亡率之间存在明显的关系。当这五个预测因子被纳入多变量回归分析中时,它们可以可靠地解释医院信托之间标准化死亡率差异的约 36%。有三个因素始终具有统计学意义:每张病床的医生人数、床位占有率以及决定入院后 4 小时内将患者安置在病床上的百分比。其中,每张病床的医生人数的影响最大。线性回归假设检验和稳健性分析表明,这些观察结果具有内部有效性。然而,我们的实证策略不能确定因果关系,我们的发现不应被解释为已建立的因果关系。本研究提供了基于系统的医疗服务提供因素与标准化死亡率之间存在显著关系的假设生成证据。这些对临床医生和政策制定者都具有重要意义。虽然确定预测因素之间的因果关系还需要进一步研究,但它为进一步研究建立了一个重要的范例。