>From the University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2024 May;22(5):341-350. doi: 10.6002/ect.2024.0055.
Urologists represent functional alternatives for transplant surgeons, but their involvement is minimal. Evaluating urologists' interests in transplant and identifying associated factors may help to determine whether recruitment of more urological providers is a viable strategy to address transplant surgeon shortages in the United States.
We emailed a 10-question survey to individuals pursuing urology in the United States and collected demographic data, education and training backgrounds, and preferences for proposed integrated residency programs and abbreviated transplant fellowships. We stratified respondents based on transplant interest (yes/no); we made comparisons by using t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with interest in transplant surgery.
Of 104 respondents, 98 were included in the final analysis, with 47% indicating a current or prior interest in transplantation. Male respondents were 3.7 times more likely than female respondents to be interested (odds ratio = 4.675; 95% CI, 1.411-15.495; P = .012). Participants aged <30 years were 93% less likely than older participants to be interested in transplantation (odds ratio = 0.071; 95% CI, 0.006-0.779; P = .03). International medical graduates reported higher enthusiasm for transplantation compared with US-trained counterparts (89% vs 42%), with a trend toward significance (P = .06). Nearly all (93%, 43/46) who expressed interest endorsed having an integrated training pathway. Only 70% (32/46) supported an abbreviated fellowship (<24 mo). Lifestyle concerns and insufficient exposure during residency were the most frequently cited reasons for lack of interest.
Compared with male and older urology trainees, female and younger urology trainees were less inclined to pursue transplant surgery. Nonetheless, urologists represent an untapped pool of transplant surgeons. Proposing an integrated training program for urologists and increasing exposure to transplantation during urology residency represent potential strategies to decrease transplant surgeon shortages.
泌尿科医师是移植外科医师的功能替代者,但他们的参与度很低。评估泌尿科医师对移植的兴趣并确定相关因素,可能有助于确定招募更多泌尿科医师是否是解决美国移植外科医师短缺的可行策略。
我们向美国从事泌尿科工作的个人发送了一份 10 个问题的调查问卷,并收集了人口统计学数据、教育和培训背景,以及对拟议的综合住院医师培训计划和缩短移植研究员培训的偏好。我们根据对移植的兴趣(是/否)对受访者进行分层;我们使用 t 检验比较连续变量,使用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类变量。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与对移植手术感兴趣相关的因素。
在 104 名回复者中,有 98 名被纳入最终分析,其中 47%表示目前或以前对移植感兴趣。男性回复者对移植感兴趣的可能性是女性回复者的 3.7 倍(优势比=4.675;95%置信区间,1.411-15.495;P=0.012)。年龄<30 岁的参与者对移植感兴趣的可能性比年龄较大的参与者低 93%(优势比=0.071;95%置信区间,0.006-0.779;P=0.03)。国际医学毕业生报告对移植的热情高于美国受训者(89%比 42%),有显著趋势(P=0.06)。几乎所有(93%,43/46)表示感兴趣的人都支持综合培训途径。只有 70%(32/46)支持缩短研究员培训(<24 个月)。生活方式问题和住院医师期间接触不足是缺乏兴趣的最常被提及的原因。
与男性和年龄较大的泌尿科医师相比,女性和年龄较小的泌尿科医师更不愿意从事移植手术。尽管如此,泌尿科医师代表了一个未开发的移植外科医师群体。为泌尿科医师提出综合培训计划并在泌尿科住院医师培训期间增加对移植的接触,这可能是减少移植外科医师短缺的策略。