Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11042-8.
As medical treatment increasingly focuses on improving health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an essential component of clinical research. The National Gynae-Oncology Registry (NGOR) is an Australian clinical quality registry. A suitable PROM was required for the NGOR ovarian cancer module to complement clinical outcomes and provide insights into outcomes important to patients. Our narrative review aimed to identify existing ovarian cancer-specific PROMs and ascertain which tool would be most appropriate for implementation into the NGOR ovarian cancer module.A literature review of Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases was performed to identify existing ovarian cancer-specific PROM tools. A steering committee was convened to (1) determine the purpose of, and criteria for our required PROM; and (2) to review the available tools against the criteria and recommend the most appropriate one for implementation within the NGOR.The literature review yielded five tools: MOST, EORTC QLQ-OV28, FACIT-O, NFOSI-18 and QOL-OVCA. All were developed and validated for use in clinical trials, but none had been validated for use in clinical quality registry. Our expert steering committee pre-determined purpose of a PROM tool for use within the NGOR was to enable cross-service comparison and benchmarking to drive quality improvements. They identified that while there was no ideal, pre-existing, ovarian cancer-specific PROM tool for implementation into the NGOR, on the basis of its psychometric properties, its available translations, its length and its ability to be adapted, the EORTC tool is most fit-for-purpose for integration into the NGOR.This process enabled identification of the tool most appropriate to provide insights into how ovarian cancer treatments impact patients' quality of life and permit benchmarking across health services.
随着医疗越来越注重提高与健康相关的生活质量,患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)是临床研究的重要组成部分。国家妇科肿瘤学登记处(NGOR)是澳大利亚的一个临床质量登记处。为了补充临床结果并深入了解对患者重要的结果,NGOR 卵巢癌模块需要一个合适的 PROM。我们的叙述性综述旨在确定现有的卵巢癌特异性 PROM,并确定哪种工具最适合纳入 NGOR 卵巢癌模块。
我们对 Cochrane Library、Embase、MEDLINE 和 PubMed 数据库进行了文献回顾,以确定现有的卵巢癌特异性 PROM 工具。召集了一个指导委员会,以确定我们所需 PROM 的目的和标准;并根据标准审查可用工具,并推荐最适合纳入 NGOR 的工具。
MOST、EORTC QLQ-OV28、FACIT-O、NFOSI-18 和 QOL-OVCA。所有这些工具都是为临床试验开发和验证的,但没有一个在临床质量登记处得到验证。我们的专家指导委员会预先确定了在 NGOR 中使用 PROM 工具的目的,即能够进行跨服务比较和基准测试,以推动质量改进。他们认为,虽然没有理想的、预先存在的、适用于纳入 NGOR 的卵巢癌特异性 PROM 工具,但基于其心理测量特性、可用的翻译版本、长度以及适应能力,EORTC 工具最适合纳入 NGOR。
这一过程确定了最适合提供有关卵巢癌治疗如何影响患者生活质量的见解并允许在卫生服务机构之间进行基准测试的工具。