Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03539-x.
To investigate the characteristics of eye movement in children with anisometropic amblyopia, and to compare those characteristics with eye movement in a control group.
31 children in the anisometropic amblyopia group (31 amblyopic eyes in group A, 31 contralateral eyes in group B) and 24 children in the control group (48 eyes in group C). Group A was subdivided into groups Aa (severe amblyopia) and Ab (mild-moderate amblyopia). The overall age range was 6-12 years (mean, 7.83 ± 1.79 years). All children underwent ophthalmic examinations; eye movement parameters including saccade latency and amplitude were evaluated using an Eyelink1000 eye tracker. Data Viewer and MATLAB software were used for data analysis.
Mean and maximum saccade latencies, as well as mean and maximum saccade amplitudes, were significantly greater in group A than in groups B and C before and after treatment (P < 0.05). Mean and maximum saccade latencies were significantly different among groups Aa, Ab, and C (P < 0.05). Pupil trajectories in two detection modes suggested that binocular fixation was better than monocular fixation.
Eye movement parameters significantly differed between contralateral normal eyes and control eyes. Clinical evaluation of children with anisometropic amblyopia should not focus only on static visual acuity, but also on the assessment of eye movement.
探讨屈光不正性弱视儿童的眼球运动特征,并与对照组进行比较。
选择屈光不正性弱视儿童 31 例(弱视眼 31 只,A 组;对侧眼 31 只,B 组)和对照组儿童 24 例(48 只眼,C 组)。A 组分为 Aa 组(重度弱视)和 Ab 组(轻中度弱视)。总年龄范围为 6-12 岁(平均 7.83±1.79 岁)。所有儿童均接受眼科检查;使用 Eyelink1000 眼动仪评估眼球运动参数,包括扫视潜伏期和幅度。使用 Data Viewer 和 MATLAB 软件进行数据分析。
治疗前后 A 组的平均扫视潜伏期和最大扫视潜伏期、平均扫视幅度和最大扫视幅度均显著大于 B 组和 C 组(P<0.05)。Aa、Ab 和 C 组之间平均扫视潜伏期和最大扫视潜伏期存在显著差异(P<0.05)。两种检测模式下的瞳孔轨迹表明双眼固视优于单眼固视。
正常对侧眼和对照组的眼球运动参数存在显著差异。对屈光不正性弱视儿童的临床评估不应仅关注静态视力,还应评估眼球运动。