Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Hear Res. 2024 Sep 1;450:109075. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109075. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading symmetric biphasic (C-BP) pulses for electrical stimulation. It remains unclear whether asymmetric pulses emphasizing the anodic or cathodic phase may improve spectral and temporal coding with CIs. This study tested place- and temporal-pitch sensitivity with C-BP, anodic-centered triphasic (A-TP), and cathodic-centered triphasic (C-TP) pulse trains on apical, middle, and basal electrodes in 10 implanted ears. Virtual channel ranking (VCR) thresholds (for place-pitch sensitivity) were measured at both a low and a high pulse rate of 99 (Experiment 1) and 1000 (Experiment 2) pulses per second (pps), and amplitude modulation frequency ranking (AMFR) thresholds (for temporal-pitch sensitivity) were measured at a 1000-pps pulse rate in Experiment 3. All stimuli were presented in monopolar mode. Results of all experiments showed that detection thresholds, most comfortable levels (MCLs), VCR thresholds, and AMFR thresholds were higher on more basal electrodes. C-BP pulses had longer active phase duration and thus lower detection thresholds and MCLs than A-TP and C-TP pulses. Compared to C-TP pulses, A-TP pulses had lower detection thresholds at the 99-pps but not the 1000-pps pulse rate, and had lower MCLs at both pulse rates. A-TP pulses led to lower VCR thresholds than C-BP pulses, and in turn than C-TP pulses, at the 1000-pps pulse rate. However, pulse shape did not affect VCR thresholds at the 99-pps pulse rate (possibly due to the fixed temporal pitch) or AMFR thresholds at the 1000-pps pulse rate (where the overall high performance may have reduced the changes with different pulse shapes). Notably, stronger polarity effect on VCR thresholds (or more improvement in VCR with A-TP than with C-TP pulses) at the 1000-pps pulse rate was associated with stronger polarity effect on detection thresholds at the 99-pps pulse rate (consistent with more degeneration of auditory nerve peripheral processes). The results suggest that A-TP pulses may improve place-pitch sensitivity or spectral coding for CI users, especially in situations with peripheral process degeneration.
当代的人工耳蜗(CI)使用阴极领先对称双相(C-BP)脉冲进行电刺激。目前尚不清楚强调阳极或阴极相的不对称脉冲是否可以改善 CI 的频谱和时间编码。本研究在 10 个植入耳的顶部、中部和底部电极上使用 C-BP、阳极中心三相(A-TP)和阴极中心三相(C-TP)脉冲序列测试了位置和时间音调敏感性。在低脉冲率 99(实验 1)和高脉冲率 1000(实验 2)脉冲每秒(pps)下,通过虚拟通道排序(VCR)阈值(用于位置音调敏感性)进行测量,在实验 3 中以 1000pps 脉冲率测量幅度调制频率排序(AMFR)阈值(用于时间音调敏感性)。所有刺激均以单极模式呈现。所有实验的结果表明,在更基底的电极上,检测阈值、最舒适水平(MCL)、VCR 阈值和 AMFR 阈值更高。C-BP 脉冲的活动相持续时间较长,因此与 A-TP 和 C-TP 脉冲相比,检测阈值和 MCL 较低。与 C-TP 脉冲相比,A-TP 脉冲在 99pps 但不在 1000pps 脉冲率下具有较低的检测阈值,并且在两个脉冲率下具有较低的 MCL。在 1000pps 脉冲率下,A-TP 脉冲比 C-BP 脉冲具有更低的 VCR 阈值,而 C-TP 脉冲的 VCR 阈值更低。然而,脉冲形状在 99pps 脉冲率下(可能由于固定的时间音高)或在 1000pps 脉冲率下(在高整体性能下,可能减少了不同脉冲形状的变化)对 VCR 阈值没有影响。值得注意的是,在 1000pps 脉冲率下,VCR 阈值的极性效应更强(或 A-TP 脉冲比 C-TP 脉冲对 VCR 的改善更大)与在 99pps 脉冲率下的检测阈值的极性效应更强(与听神经外围过程的更退化一致)相关。结果表明,A-TP 脉冲可能会提高 CI 用户的音调敏感性或频谱编码,特别是在存在外周过程退化的情况下。