Suppr超能文献

脉冲形状对人工耳蜗使用者音调感知的影响。

Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.

机构信息

Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2024 Sep 1;450:109075. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109075. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

Abstract

Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading symmetric biphasic (C-BP) pulses for electrical stimulation. It remains unclear whether asymmetric pulses emphasizing the anodic or cathodic phase may improve spectral and temporal coding with CIs. This study tested place- and temporal-pitch sensitivity with C-BP, anodic-centered triphasic (A-TP), and cathodic-centered triphasic (C-TP) pulse trains on apical, middle, and basal electrodes in 10 implanted ears. Virtual channel ranking (VCR) thresholds (for place-pitch sensitivity) were measured at both a low and a high pulse rate of 99 (Experiment 1) and 1000 (Experiment 2) pulses per second (pps), and amplitude modulation frequency ranking (AMFR) thresholds (for temporal-pitch sensitivity) were measured at a 1000-pps pulse rate in Experiment 3. All stimuli were presented in monopolar mode. Results of all experiments showed that detection thresholds, most comfortable levels (MCLs), VCR thresholds, and AMFR thresholds were higher on more basal electrodes. C-BP pulses had longer active phase duration and thus lower detection thresholds and MCLs than A-TP and C-TP pulses. Compared to C-TP pulses, A-TP pulses had lower detection thresholds at the 99-pps but not the 1000-pps pulse rate, and had lower MCLs at both pulse rates. A-TP pulses led to lower VCR thresholds than C-BP pulses, and in turn than C-TP pulses, at the 1000-pps pulse rate. However, pulse shape did not affect VCR thresholds at the 99-pps pulse rate (possibly due to the fixed temporal pitch) or AMFR thresholds at the 1000-pps pulse rate (where the overall high performance may have reduced the changes with different pulse shapes). Notably, stronger polarity effect on VCR thresholds (or more improvement in VCR with A-TP than with C-TP pulses) at the 1000-pps pulse rate was associated with stronger polarity effect on detection thresholds at the 99-pps pulse rate (consistent with more degeneration of auditory nerve peripheral processes). The results suggest that A-TP pulses may improve place-pitch sensitivity or spectral coding for CI users, especially in situations with peripheral process degeneration.

摘要

当代的人工耳蜗(CI)使用阴极领先对称双相(C-BP)脉冲进行电刺激。目前尚不清楚强调阳极或阴极相的不对称脉冲是否可以改善 CI 的频谱和时间编码。本研究在 10 个植入耳的顶部、中部和底部电极上使用 C-BP、阳极中心三相(A-TP)和阴极中心三相(C-TP)脉冲序列测试了位置和时间音调敏感性。在低脉冲率 99(实验 1)和高脉冲率 1000(实验 2)脉冲每秒(pps)下,通过虚拟通道排序(VCR)阈值(用于位置音调敏感性)进行测量,在实验 3 中以 1000pps 脉冲率测量幅度调制频率排序(AMFR)阈值(用于时间音调敏感性)。所有刺激均以单极模式呈现。所有实验的结果表明,在更基底的电极上,检测阈值、最舒适水平(MCL)、VCR 阈值和 AMFR 阈值更高。C-BP 脉冲的活动相持续时间较长,因此与 A-TP 和 C-TP 脉冲相比,检测阈值和 MCL 较低。与 C-TP 脉冲相比,A-TP 脉冲在 99pps 但不在 1000pps 脉冲率下具有较低的检测阈值,并且在两个脉冲率下具有较低的 MCL。在 1000pps 脉冲率下,A-TP 脉冲比 C-BP 脉冲具有更低的 VCR 阈值,而 C-TP 脉冲的 VCR 阈值更低。然而,脉冲形状在 99pps 脉冲率下(可能由于固定的时间音高)或在 1000pps 脉冲率下(在高整体性能下,可能减少了不同脉冲形状的变化)对 VCR 阈值没有影响。值得注意的是,在 1000pps 脉冲率下,VCR 阈值的极性效应更强(或 A-TP 脉冲比 C-TP 脉冲对 VCR 的改善更大)与在 99pps 脉冲率下的检测阈值的极性效应更强(与听神经外围过程的更退化一致)相关。结果表明,A-TP 脉冲可能会提高 CI 用户的音调敏感性或频谱编码,特别是在存在外周过程退化的情况下。

相似文献

1
Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
Hear Res. 2024 Sep 1;450:109075. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109075. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Apr;12(2):233-51. doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0248-x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
6
Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Oct;16(5):653-68. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0530-z. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
7
Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Hear Res. 2014 Mar;309:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
8
Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
Hear Res. 2024 Jul;448:109026. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109026. Epub 2024 May 16.
9
Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
Hear Res. 2019 Jan;371:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
10
Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2019 Nov;20(6):312-323. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1656847. Epub 2019 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验