Suppr超能文献

自由对接和基于模板的对接:物理与基于知识的对接。

Free-Docking and Template-Based Docking: Physics Versus Knowledge-Based Docking.

机构信息

Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2780:27-41. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_3.

Abstract

Docking methods can be used to predict the orientations of two or more molecules with respect of each other using a plethora of various algorithms, which can be based on the physics of interactions or can use information from databases and templates. The usability of these approaches depends on the type and size of the molecules, whose relative orientation will be estimated. The two most important limitations are (i) the computational cost of the prediction and (ii) the availability of the structural information for similar complexes. In general, if there is enough information about similar systems, knowledge-based and template-based methods can significantly reduce the computational cost while providing high accuracy of the prediction. However, if the information about the system topology and interactions between its partners is scarce, physics-based methods are more reliable or even the only choice. In this chapter, knowledge-, template-, and physics-based methods will be compared and briefly discussed providing examples of their usability with a special emphasis on physics-based protein-protein, protein-peptide, and protein-fullerene docking in the UNRES coarse-grained model.

摘要

对接方法可用于使用各种算法预测两个或多个分子相对于彼此的取向,这些算法可以基于相互作用的物理原理,也可以利用来自数据库和模板的信息。这些方法的可用性取决于要估算其相对取向的分子的类型和大小。两个最重要的限制因素是:(i) 预测的计算成本和 (ii) 类似复合物的结构信息的可用性。通常,如果有足够多的类似系统的信息,基于知识和基于模板的方法可以显著降低计算成本,同时提供预测的高精度。但是,如果系统拓扑结构和相互作用的信息很少,基于物理的方法则更可靠,甚至是唯一的选择。在本章中,将对基于知识、基于模板和基于物理的方法进行比较和简要讨论,并提供它们的可用性示例,特别强调基于 UNRES 粗粒模型的物理蛋白-蛋白、蛋白-肽和蛋白-富勒烯对接。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验