Division of Orthodontics Department of Oral Health Sciences Faculty of Dentistry University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dental Research Center Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Jul 3;2024:8783660. doi: 10.1155/2024/8783660. eCollection 2024.
The stage of tooth formation is one of the most reliable indicators for predicting a patient's developmental age by radiographs. This study compared the accuracy of three distinct dental age estimation methods (Demirjian, Nolla, and Willems) in children aged 3-17 in the northern Iranian population. This cross-sectional study examined panoramic radiographs of 434 children aged 3-17 from Mazandaran Province, Iran, who had teeth 31-37 present on the left mandible. This study employed the Demirjian, Nolla, and Willems methods to estimate the dental age of the sample and compare it with the chronological age. The data were analyzed using SPSS v16. A paired -test was used to compare chronological and dental ages. The Pearson correlation was used to correlate the chronological and dental ages. The errors of different methods were compared using the Wilcoxon test. values < 0.05 were considered significant for all tests except Wilcoxon. For Wilcoxon, a value < 0.017 was considered significant. The three methods presented differing mean estimated ages. The Demirjian method delivered the highest mean, and all three methods differed significantly when compared in pairs. The results showed that the Demirjian method overestimated chronological age by 0.25 years ( < 0.001) in girls and 0.09 years ( = 0.28) in boys. The Willems method underestimated chronological age by 0.05 years ( = 0.47) in girls and 0.12 years ( = 0.13) in boys. The Nolla method underestimated chronological age by 0.41 years ( < 0.001) in girls and 0.40 years ( < 0.001) in boys. The accuracy of each method varied with the patient's age. According to the findings, the Willems method outperformed the Demirjian method, and the Demirjian method exceeded the Nolla method for estimating dental age in Iranian children aged 3-17. Overall, the Demirjian method overestimated the age of the study population, whereas the other two underestimated it.
牙齿形成阶段是通过 X 光片预测患者发育年龄的最可靠指标之一。本研究比较了三种不同的牙龄估计方法(Demirjian、Nolla 和 Willems)在伊朗北部人群中 3-17 岁儿童中的准确性。这项横断面研究检查了来自伊朗马赞达兰省 434 名 3-17 岁儿童的全景 X 光片,这些儿童的下颌左侧有 31-37 颗牙齿。本研究采用 Demirjian、Nolla 和 Willems 方法来估计样本的牙龄,并将其与实际年龄进行比较。使用 SPSS v16 对数据进行分析。采用配对检验比较实际年龄和牙龄。采用 Pearson 相关分析比较实际年龄和牙龄的相关性。采用 Wilcoxon 检验比较不同方法的误差。除 Wilcoxon 检验外,所有检验均以 <0.05 为显著。对于 Wilcoxon 检验,以 <0.017 为显著。三种方法呈现出不同的平均估计年龄。Demirjian 方法提供的平均值最高,两两比较时,三种方法均有显著差异。结果表明,Demirjian 方法高估了女性实际年龄 0.25 岁( <0.001),男性实际年龄 0.09 岁( = 0.28)。Willems 方法低估了女性实际年龄 0.05 岁( = 0.47),男性实际年龄 0.12 岁( = 0.13)。Nolla 方法低估了女性实际年龄 0.41 岁( <0.001),男性实际年龄 0.40 岁( <0.001)。每种方法的准确性随患者年龄的不同而变化。根据研究结果,Willems 方法优于 Demirjian 方法,而 Demirjian 方法在估计 3-17 岁伊朗儿童的牙龄时优于 Nolla 方法。总体而言,Demirjian 方法高估了研究人群的年龄,而其他两种方法则低估了该年龄。