Thode Sorin, Perry Keith, Cyr Samuel, Ducharme Anique, Puissant David, Brouillette Judith
Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Transplant. 2023 Sep 7;2:1250184. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1250184. eCollection 2023.
In end-stage diseases, transplantation may be necessary. The limited number of donors led to the development of several pre-transplant psychosocial assessment tools. We summarized the predictive value of these tools before solid-organ transplantation.
The PRISMA search strategy and the MEDLINE database were used to review the literature. From 1,050 records, we found thirteen studies using four different scales (Millon Behavioral Health Inventory [MBHI], Psychosocial Assessment of Transplant Candidates [PACT], Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation [SIPAT], and Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale [TERS]).
TERS and MBHI were associated with the highest number of positive studies concerning pre-transplant scores and primary outcomes. Psychosocial scales predict in a systematic way psychosocial and health behavioural outcomes, but generated mixed results for mortality and rejection.
This narrative review underlines the need for multidisciplinary evaluation and well-conducted clinical trials to assist transplant teams in utilizing psychosocial evaluation effectively during evaluation of candidates.
在终末期疾病中,可能需要进行移植。供体数量有限促使了几种移植前心理社会评估工具的发展。我们总结了这些工具在实体器官移植前的预测价值。
采用PRISMA检索策略和MEDLINE数据库对文献进行综述。从1050条记录中,我们发现了13项使用四种不同量表(米隆行为健康量表[MBHI]、移植候选者心理社会评估量表[PACT]、斯坦福移植综合心理社会评估量表[SIPAT]和移植评估评分量表[TERS])的研究。
TERS和MBHI与关于移植前评分和主要结局的阳性研究数量最多相关。心理社会量表以系统的方式预测心理社会和健康行为结局,但在死亡率和排斥反应方面产生了混合结果。
这篇叙述性综述强调了多学科评估和开展良好的临床试验的必要性,以协助移植团队在候选者评估期间有效利用心理社会评估。