• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度创伤性脑损伤中的瞳孔动态变化与调节反应

Pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in mild traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Dutta Pritam, Atiya Ayisha, Vittal Smita, Ambika S, Hussaindeen Jameel Rizwana

机构信息

Sankara Nethralaya Academy, Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Binocular Vision and Neuro-Optometry, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 May 23;14(2):248-255. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169
PMID:39027072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11253999/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To measure the pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as compared to age-matched controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective comparative study was carried out at the neuro-optometry clinic of a tertiary eye care hospital. Sixty-three subjects with a history of mTBI and ninety age-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Subjects in the age range of 18-35 years were included in the study. A comprehensive neuro-optometric assessment was performed followed by pupillary dynamics and accommodation response measurements using NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 and Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 binocular accommodation auto ref/keratometer | shigiya machinery works LTD.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was noticed for constriction percentage (%): 32.73 ± 9.20 versus 39.93 ± 7.36 ( < 0.001), average constriction velocity (mm/s): 2.24 ± 0.85 versus 2.62 ± 0.68 ( = 0.002), maximum constriction velocity (mm/s): 3.82 ± 1.33 versus 4.42 ± 0.93 ( = 0.004) and T75 (recovery period to 75% of the baseline pupillary diameter in sec): 1.38 ± 0.36 versus 2.0 ± 0.82 ( < 0.001) in mTBI compared to age-matched controls. A statistically significant difference was noted for accommodative response (in D) as well as in the sample as compared to age-matched controls: -1.12 ± 0.64 versus - 1.39 ± 0.47 ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pupillary constriction velocities and accommodative response are significantly affected in mTBI. These findings have important clinical implications in being able to understand the visual symptoms following an mTBI.

摘要

目的

与年龄匹配的对照组相比,测量轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者的瞳孔动态变化和调节反应。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性比较研究在一家三级眼科护理医院的神经验光诊所进行。本研究纳入了63名有mTBI病史的受试者和90名年龄匹配的对照组。研究纳入了年龄在18 - 35岁之间的受试者。进行了全面的神经验光评估,随后使用NeurOptics®瞳孔光反射™ - 3000和Grand - Seiko WAM - 5500双目调节自动验光仪/角膜曲率计|志屋机械工程有限公司测量瞳孔动态变化和调节反应。

结果

与年龄匹配的对照组相比,mTBI患者在收缩百分比(%)方面存在统计学显著差异:32.73±9.20对39.93±7.36(<0.001),平均收缩速度(mm/s):2.24±0.85对2.62±0.68(=0.002),最大收缩速度(mm/s):3.82±1.33对4.42±0.93(=0.004)以及T75(恢复到基线瞳孔直径75%的时间,单位为秒):1.38±0.3对2.0±0.82(<0.001)。与年龄匹配的对照组相比,在调节反应(单位为屈光度)以及样本中也发现了统计学显著差异:-1.12±0.64对-1.39±0.47(<0.001)。

结论

mTBI患者的瞳孔收缩速度和调节反应受到显著影响。这些发现对于理解mTBI后的视觉症状具有重要的临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a75/11253999/78e0ae996281/TJO-14-248-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a75/11253999/481591f8e965/TJO-14-248-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a75/11253999/78e0ae996281/TJO-14-248-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a75/11253999/481591f8e965/TJO-14-248-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a75/11253999/78e0ae996281/TJO-14-248-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤中的瞳孔动态变化与调节反应
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 May 23;14(2):248-255. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
2
Comparison of pupillary dynamics to light in the mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and normal populations.轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)人群与正常人群瞳孔对光反应动力学的比较。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(11):1378-1389. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1195922. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
3
Pupillary responses to light in chronic non-blast-induced mTBI.慢性非爆炸所致轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的瞳孔对光反应
Brain Inj. 2015;29(12):1420-5. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1045029. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
4
Influence of refractive error on pupillary dynamics in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations.屈光不正对正常人群和轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)人群瞳孔动力学的影响。
J Optom. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
5
Objective Pupillary Correlates of Photosensitivity in the Normal and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Populations.正常及轻度创伤性脑损伤人群中光敏感性的客观瞳孔关联因素
Mil Med. 2016 Oct;181(10):1382-1390. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00587.
6
Accommodative and pupillary dysfunctions in concussion/mild traumatic brain injury: A Review.脑震荡/轻度创伤性脑损伤中的调节和瞳孔功能障碍:综述
NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;50(3):261-278. doi: 10.3233/NRE-228011.
7
Pupillary manifestations of Marfan syndrome: from the Marfan eye consortium of Chicago.马凡综合征的瞳孔表现:来自芝加哥马凡眼部联盟
Ophthalmic Genet. 2018 Jun;39(3):297-299. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2018.1424207. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Quantifying pupillary asymmetry through objective binocular pupillometry in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations.通过客观双眼瞳孔测量法对正常人群和轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)人群的瞳孔不对称性进行量化。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(11):1372-1377. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1192220. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
9
Normative Values for Pupillary Light Reflex Metrics Among Healthy Service Academy Cadets.健康的军校学员瞳孔光反射测量的正常值。
Mil Med. 2024 Jul 3;189(7-8):1593-1602. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad271.
10
Longitudinal changes in oculomotor function in young adults with mild traumatic brain injury in Sweden: an exploratory prospective observational study.瑞典轻度创伤性脑损伤年轻成年人眼动功能的纵向变化:一项探索性前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e018734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018734.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of color and neutral density filters on dynamic accommodation in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.颜色和中性密度滤光片对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者动态调节的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Aug 11;19:1630514. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1630514. eCollection 2025.
2
A Study on Optometrists' Knowledge, Awareness, and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Visual Disorders in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯验光师对创伤性脑损伤相关视觉障碍的知识、认知及管理的研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;13(13):1609. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131609.
3
Visual Dysfunctions in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Focus on Accommodative System Impairments.

本文引用的文献

1
Binocular accommodative response with extended depth of focus under controlled convergences.在受控集合下,具有扩展景深的双眼调节反应。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):21. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.21.
2
Visual profile of acquired brain injury in Indian cohort: a retrospective study.印度队列中获得性脑损伤的视觉特征:一项回顾性研究。
Brain Inj. 2020 Jul 28;34(9):1168-1174. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1792985. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Understanding the effects of mild traumatic brain injury on the pupillary light reflex.了解轻度创伤性脑损伤对瞳孔光反射的影响。
轻度创伤性脑损伤中的视觉功能障碍:聚焦调节系统损伤
Life (Basel). 2025 May 6;15(5):744. doi: 10.3390/life15050744.
Concussion. 2017 Aug 3;2(3):CNC36. doi: 10.2217/cnc-2016-0029. eCollection 2017 Nov.
4
Vergence Neural Pathways: A Systematic Narrative Literature Review.聚散神经通路:系统的叙述性文献综述
Neuroophthalmology. 2016 Sep 2;40(5):209-218. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2016.1217028. eCollection 2016 Oct.
5
Prevalence of non-strabismic anomalies of binocular vision in Tamil Nadu: report 2 of BAND study.泰米尔纳德邦双眼视觉非斜视性异常的患病率:BAND研究报告2
Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Nov;100(6):642-648. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12496. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Objective Pupillary Correlates of Photosensitivity in the Normal and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Populations.正常及轻度创伤性脑损伤人群中光敏感性的客观瞳孔关联因素
Mil Med. 2016 Oct;181(10):1382-1390. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00587.
7
Comparison of pupillary dynamics to light in the mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and normal populations.轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)人群与正常人群瞳孔对光反应动力学的比较。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(11):1378-1389. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1195922. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
8
Pupillary responses to light in chronic non-blast-induced mTBI.慢性非爆炸所致轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的瞳孔对光反应
Brain Inj. 2015;29(12):1420-5. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1045029. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Vision concerns after mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后的视力问题。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2015 Feb;17(2):329. doi: 10.1007/s11940-014-0329-y.
10
Prevalence and risk-factors of neurogenic heterotopic ossification in traumatic spinal cord and traumatic brain injured patients admitted to specialised units in Australia.澳大利亚专科病房收治的创伤性脊髓损伤和创伤性脑损伤患者中神经源性异位骨化的患病率及危险因素
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2014 Mar;14(1):19-28.