• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨水泥型全膝关节置换术中无菌性松动危险因素的综合评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for aseptic loosening in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yao Kaiyi, Chen Yao

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University Ghent Belgium.

Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics Ghent University Ghent Belgium.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 21;11(3):e12095. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12095. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/jeo2.12095
PMID:39035847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11260281/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Aseptic loosening is the most common cause for revisions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite many studies exploring various risk factors associated with aseptic loosening, findings often present inconsistencies. To address this, we conducted a thorough review of the literature to identify and analyse these risk factors in cemented TKA. Additionally, we performed a meta-analysis to reconcile the divergent conclusions observed across studies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase from 1996 up to 2024 and evaluated the quality of the included literature. Seventy-four studies were included to assess the association of BMI, diabetes, high physical activity (HPA), osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cement material and implant design. Twenty-nine studies were used to calculate relative risk and CIs (using the random effects theory) and study heterogeneity for six different risk factors (BMI, diabetes, HPA level, cement material, polyethylene and implant design).

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes are eight times more likely to experience aseptic loosening compared to those without diabetes (RR = 9.18, 95% CI: 1.80-46.77,  < 0.01). The use of tibial stem extension or highly crosslinked polyethylene can help reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. However, we did not identify BMI, HPA, osteoporosis, RA, the use of high-viscosity cement and the utilization of mobile-bearing designs as risk factors for aseptic loosening post-cemented TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes undergoing TKA should be counselled regarding their potential increased risk of aseptic loosening. The use of tibial stem extensions and HXLPE can mitigate the incidence of aseptic loosening in cemented TKA. However, given a limited number of studies were included in the meta-analysis, we believe that higher-level studies are necessary to clearly identify other risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

目的

无菌性松动是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后翻修的最常见原因。尽管有许多研究探讨了与无菌性松动相关的各种风险因素,但研究结果往往存在不一致性。为解决这一问题,我们对文献进行了全面回顾,以识别和分析骨水泥型TKA中的这些风险因素。此外,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以协调各研究中观察到的不同结论。

方法

我们检索了1996年至2024年的PubMed、Web of Science和Embase,并评估了纳入文献的质量。纳入74项研究以评估体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病、高体力活动(HPA)、骨质疏松症、类风湿性关节炎(RA)、骨水泥材料和植入物设计之间的关联。29项研究用于计算相对风险和可信区间(使用随机效应理论),并研究六个不同风险因素(BMI、糖尿病、HPA水平、骨水泥材料、聚乙烯和植入物设计)的研究异质性。

结果

与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者发生无菌性松动的可能性高八倍(RR = 9.18,95% CI:1.80 - 46.77,P < 0.01)。使用胫骨柄延长术或高度交联聚乙烯有助于降低无菌性松动的发生率。然而,我们未发现BMI、HPA、骨质疏松症、RA、使用高粘度骨水泥和采用活动平台设计是骨水泥型TKA后无菌性松动的风险因素。

结论

对于接受TKA的糖尿病患者,应告知其无菌性松动风险可能增加。使用胫骨柄延长术和高交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)可降低骨水泥型TKA中无菌性松动的发生率。然而,鉴于荟萃分析中纳入的研究数量有限,我们认为需要更高级别的研究来明确识别其他风险因素。

证据级别

三级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/61d0831ec768/JEO2-11-e12095-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/fd8803da4dac/JEO2-11-e12095-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/1bd1bd311b7c/JEO2-11-e12095-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/21a84f209da6/JEO2-11-e12095-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/0be5a226cc4e/JEO2-11-e12095-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/b282cbe65966/JEO2-11-e12095-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/4a78ca684df6/JEO2-11-e12095-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/fab6088feef3/JEO2-11-e12095-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/40cba87d45f2/JEO2-11-e12095-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/d9748feb881b/JEO2-11-e12095-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/0633195c21fd/JEO2-11-e12095-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/91d854399135/JEO2-11-e12095-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/552041c03f40/JEO2-11-e12095-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/61d0831ec768/JEO2-11-e12095-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/fd8803da4dac/JEO2-11-e12095-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/1bd1bd311b7c/JEO2-11-e12095-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/21a84f209da6/JEO2-11-e12095-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/0be5a226cc4e/JEO2-11-e12095-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/b282cbe65966/JEO2-11-e12095-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/4a78ca684df6/JEO2-11-e12095-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/fab6088feef3/JEO2-11-e12095-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/40cba87d45f2/JEO2-11-e12095-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/d9748feb881b/JEO2-11-e12095-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/0633195c21fd/JEO2-11-e12095-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/91d854399135/JEO2-11-e12095-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/552041c03f40/JEO2-11-e12095-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/11260281/61d0831ec768/JEO2-11-e12095-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for aseptic loosening in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨水泥型全膝关节置换术中无菌性松动危险因素的综合评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 21;11(3):e12095. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12095. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
What Host Factors Affect Aseptic Loosening After THA and TKA?哪些宿主因素会影响全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的无菌性松动?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2700-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4220-2. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
3
Modular Tibial Stem Use and Risk of Revision for Aseptic Loosening in Cemented Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.模块化胫骨柄的使用与水泥型初次全膝关节置换术后无菌性松动的翻修风险
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1577-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Cementless TKA use as an alternative to cemented TKA in high BMI patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术在高体重指数患者中作为骨水泥型全膝关节置换术替代方案的应用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 15;11(3):e12067. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12067. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design.骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定初次全膝关节置换术使用相同假体的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1089-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.048. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
6
Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.在使用骨水泥固定柄的 416 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,采用内翻-外翻限制技术可提供可靠的重建,在早期至中期随访中具有较低的后续翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):458-462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0719.R2.
7
What Are the All-Cause Survivorship Rates and Functional Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Undergoing Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.55 岁以下初次膝关节置换患者的全因生存率和功能结局如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):507-522. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002023.
8
Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is equivalent to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)与传统聚乙烯(CPE)在全膝关节置换术中等效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee. 2021 Dec;33:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
9
Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern?现代骨水泥固定全膝关节置换术的早期结果:胫骨松动是否值得关注?
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6 Supple A):51-58. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1972.R1.
10
Early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty: a narrative overview of potentially associated factors.全膝关节置换术中胫骨组件在骨水泥-假体界面的早期无菌性松动:潜在相关因素的叙述性综述。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2022 Mar;88(1):103-111. doi: 10.52628/88.1.13.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of an ultrasonic cement removal device in revision hip and knee arthroplasty-A matched case-control study.超声骨水泥去除装置在髋关节和膝关节翻修置换术中的应用——一项配对病例对照研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 15;12(2):e70171. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70171. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the use of tibial stem extensions reduce the risk of aseptic loosening in obese patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胫骨柄延长是否降低肥胖患者初次全膝关节置换术后无菌性松动的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee. 2024 Jun;48:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Osteoporosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Higher 5-Year Implant-Related Complications.骨质疏松症与全膝关节置换术:更高的 5 年与假体相关并发症。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):948-953.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.045. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
The influence of biological DMARDs on aseptic arthroplasty loosening: a retrospective cohort study.
生物 DMARDs 对无菌性关节置换松动的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Apr 2;63(4):970-976. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead304.
4
Comparison of Outcomes in High Versus Low Activity Level Patients After Total Joint Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后高活动水平与低活动水平患者结局的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.031. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Diabetes mellitus is a potential risk factor for aseptic loosening around hip and knee arthroplasty.糖尿病是髋关节和膝关节置换术后无菌性松动的一个潜在危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 5;24(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06376-z.
6
A call to "own the bone": osteoporosis is a predictor for adverse two-year outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty.呼吁“关注骨骼”:骨质疏松是全髋关节和膝关节置换术后两年不良结局的预测因素。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2889-2894. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03499-w. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: comparable clinical and radiological results at a 10-year follow-up.在初次全膝关节置换术中,高交联聚乙烯与传统聚乙烯的比较:10 年随访时的临床和影像学结果相当。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):1082-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07226-6. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
8
A high physical activity level after total knee arthroplasty does not increase the risk of revision surgery during the first twelve years: A systematic review with meta-analysis and GRADE.全膝关节置换术后较高的身体活动水平在头十二年中不会增加翻修手术风险:一项采用Meta分析和GRADE的系统评价
Knee. 2022 Dec;39:168-184. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
9
Stemmed Versus Nonstemmed Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Similar Pattern of Aseptic Tibial Loosening in Obese Patients with Moderate Varus. 5-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.胫骨近端干骺端与非干骺端髓内钉在初次全膝关节置换中的应用:肥胖合并中度内翻畸形患者中,胫骨无菌性松动的相似模式。一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Oct;36(12):1266-1272. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755360. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Increased Rates of Tibial Aseptic Loosening in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Short Native Tibial Stem Design.短型原生胫骨柄设计的初次骨水泥型全膝关节置换术后胫骨无菌性松动发生率增加。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Apr 1;30(7):e640-e648. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00536.